The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Agentic AI Meets Data Engineering: Toward Self-Directed, Interpretable, and Balanced Pipelines
Abstract
The Agentic AI framework represents a significant advancement in data engineering by unifying automation, interpretability, and adaptability within a single intelligent system. Unlike traditional approaches, which struggle to autonomously adjust to dynamic data environments or provide transparent reasoning, Agentic AI integrates four synergistic agents: an AutoML agent for model selection and tuning, a neuro-symbolic agent for interpretable inference, a generative agent leveraging GANs for rare event synthesis, and an agentic planner that dynamically orchestrates decisions using reinforcement learning. Experimental evaluation on diverse datasets including credit card fraud detection, breast cancer diagnosis, and industrial sensor failure demonstrated the framework’s superior performance, achieving an F1-score of 0.91, 94% rule fidelity, and a reduced adaptation time of 85 seconds. These results significantly surpass baseline AutoML, standalone neuro-symbolic systems, and GAN-based models. The generative component improved minority class representation, while the neuro-symbolic engine provided rule-based explanations closely aligned with the model’s predictions. The agentic planner enabled real-time model drift detection and automatic retraining, ensuring continuous optimization. Collectively, this framework offers a powerful, self-improving pipeline capable of transforming static data processes into adaptive, goal-directed, and explainable workflows suitable for real-world, high-stakes applications.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-directed AI pipelines autonomously select models, make use of data featuring imbalanced learning classes, and manage knowledge-aware, interpretable decision-making.
“Self-directed AI pipelines autonomously select models, make use of data featuring imbalanced learning classes, and manage knowledgeaware, interpretable decision-making [54].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
The frameworks building the Neuro-Symbolic Agent, AutoML Agent, and the Agentic Planner achieve roughly 94% rule fidelity based on their ability to concisely convert the decisionmade learned model to human-readable rules.
“The frameworks building the Neuro-Symbolic Agent [161], AutoML Agent [54], and the Agentic Planner [54] achieve roughly 94% rule fidelity based on their ability to concisely convert the decisionmade learned model to human-readable rules.”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
Handling large and variable data including issues with volume, velocity, variety, and veracity places excessive strains on current system architecture.
“Additionally, handling large and variable data including issues with volume, velocity, variety, and veracity places excessive strains on current system architecture [54].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Peddisetti, S.
- Corresponding author
- Peddisetti, Srikanth
- Venue
- The International Journal of Computational Mathematical Ideas
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 17313
- ISSN
- 0974-8652 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4414188522
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Computational Mathematical Ideas (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
- Keywords
- agentic AI, data engineering pipelines, automated machine learning, model interpretability, generative adversarial networks, reinforcement learning, model drift detection, credit card fraud detection, breast cancer diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review