Cited by 0Linguistic and Sociocultural StudiesMultilingual Education and PolicyLanguage and Culture

The Impact Of Digital Platforms On Mother Tongue Preservation: Challenges And Opportunities In The Disruption Era

Open access
Judijanto, Loso, Malik, Fatima, Amarsaikhan, Dulguun·2025·Journal of Humanities Research Sustainability

Abstract

Background. In the disruption era, the rapid expansion of digital platforms has transformed communication, learning, and cultural exchange, creating both challenges and opportunities for preserving mother tongues. Globalized content consumption and dominant language use in digital spaces often marginalize minority languages, accelerating linguistic erosion. Purpose. This study aims to investigate the impact of digital platforms on mother tongue preservation, focusing on the balance between technological threats and revitalization potential. Method. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, combining literature review and case analysis of digital initiatives promoting local languages. Data were collected from scholarly publications, online communities, and interviews with language activists. Results. Findings reveal that while unregulated exposure to dominant languages can weaken intergenerational transmission, digital tools such as social media campaigns, e-learning applications, and digital archives offer innovative pathways for documentation, education, and community engagement. Conclusion. The study concludes that strategic integration of cultural values with technology can transform digital platforms into allies for mother tongue preservation. Policy support, community participation, and localized content production are critical to sustaining linguistic diversity in the digital age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70177/jhrs.v2i5.2541

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Judijanto, L., Malik, F., & Amarsaikhan, D.
Affiliations
  • Quaid-i-Azam University (PK)
  • Université Stendhal – Grenoble 3 (FR)
Venue
Journal of Humanities Research Sustainability
Published
2025-10-22
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
287-300
ISSN
  • 3048-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 3062-7540
OpenAlex
W7165358995
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Humanities Research Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
Keywords
mother tongue preservation, digital platforms, language revitalization, minority languages, endangered languages, intergenerational language transmission, language documentation, digital archives, online learning, social media campaigns, language policy, linguistic diversity, language activism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review