Cited by 14Coffee research and impactsSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Acute specific effects of caffeine-containing energy drink on different physical performances in resistance-trained men

Open access
Astley, Camilla, Souza, Diego, Polito, Marcos·2018·International Journal of Exercise Science

Abstract

Caffeine containing energy drink (ED) is frequently used as ergogenic aid, but its effect on performance need more investigation. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the effects of acute ingestion of an ED on the physical performance of resistance-trained men subjected to successive tests in the same experimental protocol. Fifteen resistance-trained males (21.0 ± 0.3 yrs; 177.4 ± 1.8 cm; 79.6 ± 1.8 kg) ingested 2.5 mg caffeine per kg of body weight (619.5 ± 14.6 mL of ED) or a placebo in a double-blind randomized cross-over design. Physical performance was randomized for the maximum repetition tests (80% 1RM) in the bench press exercise and unilateral knee extension (dominant leg), maximal isometric hand-grip test in both hands, standing long jump and repeated sprint ability test. The paired Student-t test showed that ED intake increased performance compared to the placebo for the number of repetitions in the unilateral knee extension test of the dominant leg (11.5 ± 0.9 reps vs 9.5 ± 0.8 reps; P = 0.001) and bench press (10.2 ± 0.4 reps vs 8.1 ± 0.5 reps; P = 0.01); and also increased isometric strength in the hand-grip maximal test in the right (53.7 ± 1.5 kg vs. 47.7 ± 1.6 kg; P = 0.02) and left hand (52.9 ± 1.5 kg vs. 45.9 ± 1.3 kg; P = 0.02). In conclusion, acute ingestion of ED increased performance only in specific strength tests in resistance-trained men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70252/kqvq5193

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 14

Authors
Astley, C., Souza, D., & Polito, M.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
Venue
International Journal of Exercise Science
Published
2018
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
260-268
ISSN
1939-795X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2781631680
Cited by
14
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
  • International journal of exercise science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
caffeine, energy drinks, acute caffeine ingestion, ergogenic aids, resistance-trained men, physical performance, bench press, standing long jump, repeated sprint ability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review