Pre- and Post-Activity Stretching Practices of Collegiate Soccer Coaches in the United States
Open accessAbstract
International Journal of Exercise Science 13(6): 260-272, 2020. Current pre- and post-activity stretching guidelines are designed to optimize performance and reduce injury risk. However, it is unclear whether soccer coaches adhere to these recommendations. The purpose of this study was to determine if collegiate soccer coaches’ perceptions and practices align with current scientific recommendations. A total of 781 questionnaires were electronically distributed to soccer coaches from NCAA Division I and III universities.The questionnaire obtained demographic, professional, and educational information, as well as stretching practices. Statistical analysis consisted of computing frequency counts and means where applicable. Pearson's Chi-square tests were performed to assess the potential differences in stretching perceptions and practices among the cohort of soccer coaches. Results suggest that soccer coaches are choosing some forms of stretching more frequently than other coaches (χ2= 342.7, p< 0.001). Further analysis failed to determine significant associations between stretching type and coaching certification, level, sex, years of experience, and age. Of the 209 respondents, 84.9% believed pre-activity stretching to be of greater than average importance on a seven-point Likert scale. Dynamic stretching (68.7%) or a combination of static and ballistic stretching (18.0%) prior to athletic events was the most typical stretching prescribed. Current post-activity practices demonstrate that most coaches (95.4%) are using some form of a general cool-down following practice or competition. This study is an important assessment of the extent to which collegiate coaches administer appropriate stretching techniques. Most coaches adhere to current recommendations; however, they should continue to evaluate their practices against ongoing research and the practices of their peers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Men and women coaches differ in the types of stretching activities they programme for their athletes during warm-up.
“Men and women coaches have been found to differ in the types of stretching activities they programme for their athletes during warm-up.73”
From Anterior cruciate ligament injury: towards a gendered environmental approach (2021) · cites this paper as [73]
Cites
Garber, C. E., Blissmer, B., Deschenes, M. R., Franklin, B. A., Lamonte, M. J., Lee, I.-M., Nieman, D. C., & Swain, D. P. (2011) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e318213fefb · Cited by 9,319 · see citing works
Bishop, D. (2003) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200333070-00002 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science
Navalta, J. W., & Stone, W. J. (2019) · International Journal of Exercise Science · doi:10.70252/eycd6235 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Warm-Up Strategies for Sport and Exercise: Mechanisms and Applications
McGowan, C. J., Pyne, D. B., Thompson, K. G., & Rattray, B. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0376-x · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Effects of Warming-up on Physical Performance: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
Fradkin, A. J., Zazryn, T. R., & Smoliga, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181c643a0 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Neural Aspects of Muscle Stretching
Guissard, N., & Duchateau, J. (2006) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1249/01.jes.0000240023.30373.eb · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anterior cruciate ligament injury: towards a gendered environmental approach
Parsons, J. L., Coen, S. E., & Bekker, S. (2021) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-103173 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Effects of Stretching on Injury Risk Reduction and Balance
Behm, D. G., Kay, A. D., Trajano, G. S., Alizadeh, S., & Blazevich, A. J. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Exercise Physiology · doi:10.31189/2165-6193-10.3.106 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Time to Move From Mandatory Stretching? We Need to Differentiate “Can I?” From “Do I Have To?”
Afonso, J., Olivares-Jabalera, J., & Andrade, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.714166 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Judge, L. W., Avedesian, J., Bellar, D. M., Hoover, D. L., Craig, B., Langley, J., Nordmann, N., Schoeff, M. A., & Dickin, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Ball State University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Western Michigan University (US)
- University of Southern Indiana (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Exercise Science
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1939-795X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403351222
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nd
- Locations
- International journal of exercise science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- dynamic stretching, static stretching, ballistic stretching, cool-down, injury prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review