The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Media Versus Students’ Learning Outcomes: Insights from a South-West Nigeria University
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the influence of social media on the learning outcomes of undergraduate students at the University of Ibadan, Ilesa campus, South-West Nigeria. Employing a descriptive survey research design, a total of 290 randomly selected undergraduate participants from 200 to 400 levels were included. The research instrument, a self-developed questionnaire titled “Social Media and Students’ Learning Outcomes,” demonstrated good reliability with a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.739. Data analysis was conducted using percentage, mean, and ANOVA. The findings indicate that a majority of the participants regarded themselves as moderate to proficient users of social media platforms. Notably, WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram emerged as the most favored platforms among university students. Additionally, the study highlights the discernible effects of social media on students’ attitudes, academic performance, and academic interactions. Notably, 99.3% of undergraduates were identified as active social media users. The study concludes that while social media may not inherently enhance students’ attitudes towards learning, its unique features could be strategically leveraged to augment overall learning outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of judiciously incorporating social media as a potential educational tool in the university context. Recommendations are extended to stakeholders for thoughtful consideration when integrating social media into teaching and learning practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elom, C. O., Ayerakwa, H. M., Ibrahim-Olesin, S., Deffor, E. W., Uwaleke, C. C., & Onyeneke, R. U. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1581514 · Cited by 5
Akpadaka, V. O. O., & Akpadaka, O. S. (2026) · Asian Journal of Contemporary Education · doi:10.55493/5052.v10i1.5862
“Nannim et al. (2023) further argued that weak regulatory frameworks in Nigerian institutions intensify digital distraction, while Ojo et al. (2024) linked social media use to increased procrastination and reduced attentiveness during lectures.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Ojo, O., Opeloye, B. A., & Olugbade, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Medical Sciences, Ondo (NG)
- University of Ilesa (NG)
- Abiola Ajimobi Technical University Ibadan (NG)
- ORCID
- Olugbade, Damola
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Technology and Instruction
- Publisher
- Yayasan Tauladan Fatimah Az-Zahra
- Published
- 2023-12-23
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-44
- ISSN
- 2963-458X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401851384
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Technology and Instruction. (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Keywords
- social media, learning outcomes, undergraduate students, academic performance, student attitudes, academic interaction, WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, social media in education, University of Ibadan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review