Using technology to monitor and improve zoo animal welfare
Abstract
Abstract While the international zoological community is committed to enhancing the welfare of individual animals, researchers have yet to take full advantage of the tools available for non-invasively tracking behavioural and physiological indicators of welfare. We review technology currently being applied in studies of zoo, farm and laboratory animals to regularly monitor welfare status, as well as to evaluate responses to particular stimuli and situations. In terms of behavioural measures, we focus on automated assessments that offer insight into how animals — even those that are nocturnal or elusive — behave when humans are not present. Specifically, we provide an overview of how animal-attached technology (accelerometers, global positioning systems, radio frequency identification systems) can be implemented to generate activity budgets, examine use of space, conduct gait assessments, determine rates of movement and study social dynamics. We also emphasise the value of bioacoustics, as the rate and acoustic structure of certain vocalisations may vary across contexts and reflect an animal's internal state. While it can be challenging to identify non-invasive methods for investigating physiological welfare indicators, we discuss approaches (thermography, tracking measures of heart rate) that may be especially useful for monitoring affective states and psychophysiological functioning. Finally, we make a concerted effort to highlight tools that allow welfare scientists to consider measures of positive welfare. Ultimately, zoos can ensure that each animal has the opportunity to thrive by employing technology to create baseline behavioural and physiological profiles, conduct ongoing monitoring schemes and assess responses to specific conditions, events and stimuli.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital tools play a significant role in zoological institutions, enhancing efficacy, data visualization, and multi-institutional collaborations.
“Digital tools play a significant role in zoological institutions, enhancing efficacy, data visualization, and multi-institutional collaborations (81, 100).”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [100]
The trend is for institutions to use digital tools and advanced technologies to improve welfare standards.
“However, overall, the trend is for institutions to use digital tools and advanced technologies to improve welfare standards (100).”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Whitham, J., & Miller, L.
- Venue
- Animal Welfare
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 395-409
- ISSN
- 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-1538
- OpenAlex
- W2547812505
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- zoo animal welfare, animal welfare monitoring, accelerometer, GPS tracking, radio frequency identification, activity budget, gait analysis, space use, social dynamics, bioacoustics, vocalizations, infrared thermography, heart rate monitoring, positive welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review