Cited by 76Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Using technology to monitor and improve zoo animal welfare

Whitham, JC, Miller, LJ·2016·Animal Welfare

Abstract

Abstract While the international zoological community is committed to enhancing the welfare of individual animals, researchers have yet to take full advantage of the tools available for non-invasively tracking behavioural and physiological indicators of welfare. We review technology currently being applied in studies of zoo, farm and laboratory animals to regularly monitor welfare status, as well as to evaluate responses to particular stimuli and situations. In terms of behavioural measures, we focus on automated assessments that offer insight into how animals — even those that are nocturnal or elusive — behave when humans are not present. Specifically, we provide an overview of how animal-attached technology (accelerometers, global positioning systems, radio frequency identification systems) can be implemented to generate activity budgets, examine use of space, conduct gait assessments, determine rates of movement and study social dynamics. We also emphasise the value of bioacoustics, as the rate and acoustic structure of certain vocalisations may vary across contexts and reflect an animal's internal state. While it can be challenging to identify non-invasive methods for investigating physiological welfare indicators, we discuss approaches (thermography, tracking measures of heart rate) that may be especially useful for monitoring affective states and psychophysiological functioning. Finally, we make a concerted effort to highlight tools that allow welfare scientists to consider measures of positive welfare. Ultimately, zoos can ensure that each animal has the opportunity to thrive by employing technology to create baseline behavioural and physiological profiles, conduct ongoing monitoring schemes and assess responses to specific conditions, events and stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7120/09627286.25.4.395

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 113 · Cited by 76

Authors
Whitham, J., & Miller, L.
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2016-11
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
395-409
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W2547812505
Cited by
76
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
zoo animal welfare, animal welfare monitoring, accelerometer, GPS tracking, radio frequency identification, activity budget, gait analysis, space use, social dynamics, bioacoustics, vocalizations, infrared thermography, heart rate monitoring, positive welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review