Cited by 87Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Adrenal incidentaloma: machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of unenhanced CT can effectively differentiate sPHEO from lipid-poor adrenal adenoma

Open access
Yi, Xiaoping, Guan, Xiao, Chen, Chen, Zhang, Youming, Zhang, Zhe, Li, Minghao, Liu, Peihua, Yu, Anze +4 more·2018·Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of machine learning based texture analysis of unenhanced CT images in differentiating subclinical pheochromocytoma (sPHEO) from lipid-poor adenoma (LPA) in adrenal incidentaloma (AI).Methods: Seventy-nine patients with 80 LPA and 29 patients with 30 sPHEO were included in the study.Texture parameters were derived using imaging software (MaZda).Thirty texture features were selected and LPA was performed for the features selected.The number of positive features was used to predict results.Logistic multiple regression analysis was performed on the 30 texture features, and a predictive equation was created based on the coefficients obtained.Results: LPA yielded a misclassification rate of 19.39% in differentiating sPHEO from LPA.Our predictive model had an accuracy rate of 94.4% (102/108), with a sensitivity of 86.2% (25/29) and a specificity of 97.5% (77/79) for differentiation.When the number of positive features was greater than 8, the accuracy of prediction was 85.2% (92/108), with a sensitivity of 96.6% (28/29) and a specificity of 81% (64/79).Conclusions: Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of unenhanced CT may be a reliable quantitative method in differentiating sPHEO from LPA when AI is present.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7150/jca.26356

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A feasibility study assessing machine learning-based quantitative textural analysis of unenhanced CT in 108 patients with indeterminate adrenal lesions had 94% accuracy for differentiating pheochromocytoma from lipid-poor adenoma.

    “A feasibility study assessing machine learning-based quantitative textural analysis of unenhanced CT in 108 patients with indeterminate adrenal lesions had a 94% accuracy for differentiating pheochromocytoma from lipid-poor adenoma (384).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [384]

  • At present, there is insufficient evidence to support clinical translation of textural analysis and machine learning techniques for adrenal lesions.

    “At present, there is insufficient evidence to support clinical translation, but these techniques have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and more informed decision making in the future.”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [384]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 87

Authors
Yi, X., Guan, X., Chen, C., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, M., Liu, P., Yu, A., Long, X., Liu, L., Chen, B. T., & Zee, C.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Changsha Medical University (CN)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Long, Xueying
  • Liu, Longfei
Venue
Journal of Cancer
Published
2018
Volume
9
Issue
19
Pages
3577-3582
ISSN
1837-9664 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891623084
Cited by
87
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81400773)
  • Central South University
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M632997, xywm2015I35)
  • Peking University (xywm2015I35, 2018M632997)
  • Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Central South University (185705)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
adrenal incidentaloma, quantitative texture analysis, unenhanced CT, machine learning, differential diagnosis, texture features, prediction model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review