The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraoperative Imaging-Guided Cancer Surgery: From Current Fluorescence Molecular Imaging Methods to Future Multi-Modality Imaging Technology
Open accessAbstract
Cancer is a major threat to human health. Diagnosis and treatment using precision medicine is expected to be an effective method for preventing the initiation and progression of cancer. Although anatomical and functional imaging techniques such as radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have played an important role for accurate preoperative diagnostics, for the most part these techniques cannot be applied intraoperatively. Optical molecular imaging is a promising technique that provides a high degree of sensitivity and specificity in tumor margin detection. Furthermore, existing clinical applications have proven that optical molecular imaging is a powerful intraoperative tool for guiding surgeons performing precision procedures, thus enabling radical resection and improved survival rates. However, detection depth limitation exists in optical molecular imaging methods and further breakthroughs from optical to multi-modality intraoperative imaging methods are needed to develop more extensive and comprehensive intraoperative applications. Here, we review the current intraoperative optical molecular imaging technologies, focusing on contrast agents and surgical navigation systems, and then discuss the future prospects of multi-modality imaging technology for intraoperative imaging-guided cancer surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beyond the margins: real-time detection of cancer using targeted fluorophores
Zhang, R. R., Schroeder, A. B., Grudzinski, J. J., Rosenthal, E. L., Warram, J. M., Pinchuk, A. N., Eliceiri, K. W., Kuo, J. S., & Weichert, J. P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.212 · Cited by 485
DSouza, A. V., Lin, H., Henderson, E. R., Samkoe, K. S., & Pogue, B. W. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.21.8.080901 · Cited by 414
Precise nanomedicine for intelligent therapy of cancer
Chen, H., Gu, Z., An, H., Chen, C., Chen, J., Cui, R., Chen, S., Chen, W., Chen, X., Chen, X., et al. (2018) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-018-9397-5 · Cited by 409
Self-citationNIR-II light in clinical oncology: opportunities and challenges
Zhang, Z., Du, Y., Shi, X., Wang, K., Qu, Q., Liang, Q., Ma, X., He, K., Chi, C., Tang, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-024-00892-0 · Cited by 341
Self-citationAlbumin-chaperoned cyanine dye yields superbright NIR-II fluorophore with enhanced pharmacokinetics
Tian, R., Zeng, Q., Zhu, S., Lau, J., Chandra, S., Ertsey, R., Hettie, K. S., Teraphongphom, T., Hu, Z., Niu, G., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw0672 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chi, C., Du, Y., Ye, J., Kou, D., Qiu, J., Wang, J., Tian, J., & Chen, X.
- Venue
- Theranostics
- Publisher
- Ivyspring International Publisher
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1072-1084
- ISSN
- 1838-7640 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144903953
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraoperative Imaging-Guided Cancer Surgery: From Current Fluorescence Molecular Imaging Methods to Future Multi-Modality Imaging Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7150/thno.9899
- The paper
- Chi, C., Du, Y., Ye, J., Kou, D., Qiu, J., Wang, J., Tian, J., & Chen, X. (2014). Intraoperative Imaging-Guided Cancer Surgery: From Current Fluorescence Molecular Imaging Methods to Future Multi-Modality Imaging Technology. Theranostics. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.9899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.