Cited by 2Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesMental Health and Psychiatry

A pilot study on the diagnostic performance of DMS-IV and DMS-V for autism spectrum disorder

You, Yang, Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Children�s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Wu, Bai-Lin, Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Children�s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Shen, Yiping, Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Children�s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA·2011·American Chinese Journal of Medicine and Science

Abstract

The new diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are due to be released in May 2013. The impact of changes made in the new criteria is yet to be evaluated. Here we performed a retrospective study on a cohort of ASD patients diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria, aimed to compare the diagnostic performances between DSM-IV and DSM-V. We reviewed the medical records of 163 patients with possible clinical diagnosis of ASD. Ninty-three (57%) of them met the DSM-IV criteria for Autistic disorder, the rest 70 cases were either PDD-NOS (n=39) or Asperger’s disorder (n=3) or without sufficient information in medical record to perform a clinical diagnosis (n=28). Upon re-evaluation using the new diagnostic criteria in DSM-V, only 60% of patients with previous diagnosis of autistic disorder met the new criteria. One individual who was previous diagnosed as PDD-NOS met the new diagnostic criteria for autistic disorder. The present study revealed a significant difference in diagnostic yield by new and old criteria. This pilot comparative study reveals that the ASD diagnostic criteria in DSM-V are stricter than that in DSM-IV and autism patients diagnosed using DMS-V criteria tend to be more severely affected. The new criteria will have immediate impact on the clinical diagnosis and management of individuals with neuodevelopmental disorders and it will affect the prevalence estimate of ASD in population as well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7156/v4i3p116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
You, Y., Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, C. H. B., Wu, B.-L., Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, C. H. B., Shen, Y., & Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, C. H. B.
Venue
American Chinese Journal of Medicine and Science
Publisher
Exeley, Inc.
Published
2011
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
116
ISSN
1946-9357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045192507
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
North American Journal of Medicine and Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, DSM-IV, DSM-V, diagnostic criteria, diagnostic yield, autistic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, Asperger syndrome, autism prevalence, neuropsychiatric disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review