A pilot study on the diagnostic performance of DMS-IV and DMS-V for autism spectrum disorder
Abstract
The new diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are due to be released in May 2013. The impact of changes made in the new criteria is yet to be evaluated. Here we performed a retrospective study on a cohort of ASD patients diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria, aimed to compare the diagnostic performances between DSM-IV and DSM-V. We reviewed the medical records of 163 patients with possible clinical diagnosis of ASD. Ninty-three (57%) of them met the DSM-IV criteria for Autistic disorder, the rest 70 cases were either PDD-NOS (n=39) or Asperger’s disorder (n=3) or without sufficient information in medical record to perform a clinical diagnosis (n=28). Upon re-evaluation using the new diagnostic criteria in DSM-V, only 60% of patients with previous diagnosis of autistic disorder met the new criteria. One individual who was previous diagnosed as PDD-NOS met the new diagnostic criteria for autistic disorder. The present study revealed a significant difference in diagnostic yield by new and old criteria. This pilot comparative study reveals that the ASD diagnostic criteria in DSM-V are stricter than that in DSM-IV and autism patients diagnosed using DMS-V criteria tend to be more severely affected. The new criteria will have immediate impact on the clinical diagnosis and management of individuals with neuodevelopmental disorders and it will affect the prevalence estimate of ASD in population as well.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have used clinical records as the information source rather than clinical interview.
“Additionally, many studies have used the clinical records as the information source and not the clinical interview [15,16,18,23,28]”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How will DSM-5 affect autism diagnosis? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Kulage, K. M., Smaldone, A. M., & Cohn, E. G. (2014) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2065-2 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Kalra, P., Arun, P., Chavan, B. S., & Gupta, N. (2021) · Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.1177/0973134220210103 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- You, Y., Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, C. H. B., Wu, B.-L., Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, C. H. B., Shen, Y., & Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, C. H. B.
- ORCID
- Shen, Yiping
- Venue
- American Chinese Journal of Medicine and Science
- Publisher
- Exeley, Inc.
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 116
- ISSN
- 1946-9357 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045192507
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- North American Journal of Medicine and Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, DSM-IV, DSM-V, diagnostic criteria, diagnostic yield, autistic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, Asperger syndrome, autism prevalence, neuropsychiatric disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review