The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Surgical Methods of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Zygoma is a major buttress of the midfacial skeleton, which is frequently injured because of its prominent location. Zygoma fractures are classified according to Knight and North based on the direction of anatomic displacement and the pattern created by the fracture. In zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture many incisions (lateral eyebrow, lateral upper blepharoplasty, transconjunctival, subciliary, subtarsal, intraoral, direct percutaneous approach) are useful. We reviewed various approaches for the treatment of ZMC fractures and discussed about incisions and fixation methods. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with ZMC fracture at a single institution from January 2005 to December 2014. Patients with single zygomatic arch fracture were excluded. RESULTS: The identified 694 patients who were admitted for zygomatic fractures from which 192 patients with simple arch fractures were excluded. The remaining 502 patients consisted of 439 males and 63 females, and total 532 zygomatic bone was operated. Orbital fracture was the most common associated fracture. According to the Knight and North classification the most frequent fracture was Group IV. Most fractures were fixated at two points (73%). CONCLUSION: We reviewed our cases over 10 years according to fracture type and fixation methods. In conclusion, minimal incision, familiar approach and fixation methods of the surgeon are recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 47
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Ellstrom, 2013, Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 1649, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80819 · DOI
- Meslemani, 2012, Arch Facial Plast Surg, 14, 62, 10.1001/archfacial.2011.1415 · DOI
- Knight, 1961, Br J Plast Surg, 13, 325, 10.1016/S0007-1226(60)80063-X · DOI
- Pau, 2010, Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 3, 167, 10.1055/s-0030-1263082 · DOI
- Park, 2010, J Craniofac Surg, 21, 1060, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e62cb2 · DOI
- Kim, 2011, J Craniofac Surg, 22, 1215, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c0d84 · DOI
- Uda, 2013, Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 1231, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a48d8c · DOI
- Ward Booth, 1999, Maxillofacial surgery
- Rinehart, 1989, Plast Reconstr Surg, 84, 21, 10.1097/00006534-198907000-00003 · DOI
- Ahn, 2015, Arch Craniofac Surg, 16, 131, 10.7181/acfs.2015.16.3.131 · DOI
- Lee, 2006, J Korean Med Sci, 21, 1080, 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.6.1080 · DOI · Paper page
- Langsdon, 2010, Ann Plast Surg, 65, 52, 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c1fe14 · DOI
- Burm, 2006, J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg, 33, 465
- Hwang, 2010, J Craniofac Surg, 21, 1042, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e48607 · DOI
- Mohammadinezhad, 2009, J Craniofac Surg, 20, 1398, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181acdc25 · DOI
- Hwang, 2011, J Craniofac Surg, 22, 1416, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821cc28d · DOI
- Kim, 2011, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69, 2848, 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.073 · DOI
- Zhang, 2011, J Craniofac Surg, 22, 1460, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821d1832 · DOI · Paper page
- Choi, 2013, J Craniofac Surg, 24, 557, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182700d23 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Ji, S. Y., Kim, S. S., Kim, M. H., & Yang, W. S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dong Kang General Hospital, Ulsan, Korea.
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Wan Suk
- Venue
- Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 206
- ISSN
- 2287-1152 (ISSN-L)
- 2287-5603
- PMC
- PMC5556838
- OpenAlex
- W2568222601
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Archives of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- zygomatic fractures, surgical approach, incision, fracture fixation, orbital fractures, minimally invasive approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review