CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the Longhouse and Community in Tribal Society

O'Gorman, Jodie A.·2010·American Antiquity
DOI 10.7183/0002-7316.75.3.571
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Archaeology offers a unique opportunity to explore the ways humans have created, lived within, and changed their communities. Recent research indicates important theoretical distinctions in the way in which archaeologists conceive of community, and further development of nontraditional theoretical models is necessary to improve our ability to understand communities of the past. This study offers a reconsideration of community that focuses on the incorporation of multiple spatial scales with social dynamics. Through the use of ethnographic and ethnohistoric examples, the link between community and spatial relationships in longhouse-using tribal societies is examined. A case study of community from the Oneota tradition of the North American midcontinent is then reconsidered using insights into kinds of community situated at and affecting multiple spatial scales. The reanalysis emphasizes the way human relationships in multiple social contexts created a multitude of spatially situated community links, and illustrates the importance of using alternative theoretical approaches.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7183/0002-7316.75.3.571

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The natural community/imagined community distinction is heuristically useful.

    “Like Jodie O'Gorman (O'Gorman 2010:573), I find the ''natural community''/''imagined community'' distinction heuristically useful”

    From Inside/Outside, Upside Down: Including Archaeologists in Communities (2011) · cites this paper as O'Gorman 2010:573

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 122

  1. Mason, 1976, Cultural Change and Continuity: Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin,, 335
  2. Boszhardt, 1990, The Late Woodland Study Unit in Region 6, Western Wisconsin. The Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center.
  3. Goldstein, 1981, The Archaeology of Death,, 53
  4. O’Gorman, 1995, The Tremaine Site Complex: Oneota Occupation in the La Crosse Locality, Wisconsin, Vol. 3: The Tremaine Site (47Lc95).
  5. O’Shea, 1989, Pawnee Archaeology, Central Plains Archeology, 1, 49
  6. 10.1525/aa.2000.102.3.467 · DOI
  7. McKinnon, 1991, From a Shattered Sun: Hierarchy, Gender, and Alliance in the Tanimbar Islands.
  8. Hirsch, 1995, The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and Space., 10.1093/oso/9780198278801.001.0001 · DOI
  9. Hong, 1987, Natives of Sarawak: Survival in Borneo’s Vanishing Forest.
  10. 10.1086/soutjanth.7.4.3628512 · DOI
  11. Tooker, 1991, An Ethnography of the Huron Indians, 1615–1649.
  12. 10.1525/aa.2000.102.3.485 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/482621 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/280324 · DOI
  15. Fenton, 1951, Locality as a Basic Factor in the Development of Iroquois Social Structure, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin, 149, 35
  16. 10.1177/002200277602000102 · DOI
  17. Bala, 2002, Changing Borders and Identities in the Kelabit Highlands: Anthropological Reflections on Growing Up near an International Border.
  18. Gibbon, 1991, New Perspectives on Cahokia: Views from the Peripheries,, 281
  19. Parkinson, 2002, The Archaeology of Tribal Societies,, 1
  20. O’Gorman, 1993, The Tremaine Site Complex: Oneota Occupation in the La Crosse Locality, Wisconsin, Vol. 1: The OT Site (47Lc262).
  21. 10.1017/CBO9780511607851.009 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/281538 · DOI
  23. Deetz, 1965, The Dynamics of Stylistic Change in Arikara Ceramics.
  24. Tuan, 1977, Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience.
  25. Flannery, 1976, The Early Mesoamerican Village.
  26. Morgan, 1851, League of the Ho-de’-no-sau-nee, Iroquois.
  27. Overstreet, 1995, Oneota Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future,, 33
  28. Wedel, 1986, Peering at the Iowa Indians Through the Mist of Time, Journal of the Iowa Archeological Society, 33, 1
  29. Heidenreich, 1978, Northeast,, 368
  30. Radin, 1923, The Winnebago Tribe, Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report, 37, 35
  31. 10.1007/s10814-004-0001-2 · DOI
  32. Rodell, 2000, Mounds, Modoc, and Mesoamerica: Papers in Honor of Melvin L. Fowler,, 375
  33. Longacre, 1968, New Perspectives in Archaeology,, 89
  34. Hollinger, 1995, Oneota Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future,, 141
  35. O’Gorman, 2001, Gender and the Archaeology of Death,, 23
  36. Redfield, 1955, The Little Community: Viewpoints for the Study of a Human Whole.
  37. Sahlins, 1968, Tribesmen.
  38. Bogucki, 2002, The Archaeology of Tribal Societies,, 372, 10.2307/j.ctv8bt29z.20 · DOI
  39. Waterson, 1990, The Living House: An Anthropology of Architecture in South-East Asia.
  40. Chang, 1968, Settlement Archaeology.
  41. Gallagher, 1992, Late Prehistoric Agriculture,, 95
  42. 10.2307/281492 · DOI
  43. Marshall, 2000, Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies,, 73
  44. Gallagher, 1987, Investigations into Oneota Ridged Field Agriculture on the Northern Margin of the Prairie Peninsula, Plains Anthropologist, 32, 141, 10.1080/2052546.1987.11909383 · DOI
  45. Soja, 1989, Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory.
  46. Canuto, 2000, The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective.
  47. O’Gorman, 1994, The Tremaine Site Complex: Oneota Occupation in the La Crosse Locality, Wisconsin, Vol. 2: The Filler Site (47Lcl49).
  48. Wilson, 1997, Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica,, 119
  49. Binford, 1971, Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices,, 6
  50. 10.1080/00438243.1995.9980280 · DOI
  51. Brown, 2001, Societies in Eclipse: Archaeology of the Eastern Woodlands Indians, A.D. 1400–1700,, 205
  52. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Grauer, 1995, The Tremaine Site Complex: Oneota Occupation in the La Crosse Locality, Wisconsin, Vol. 3: The Tremaine Site (47Lc95),, 409
  54. Preucel, 2000, The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective,, 58
  55. Skinner, 1926, Ethnology of the Ioway Indians, Bulletin of the Public Museum of the City of Milwaukee, 5, 181
  56. Rodell, 1997, The Diamond Bluff Site Complex: Time and Tradition in the Northern Mississippi Valley
  57. Barth, 1969, Ethnic Groups and Boundaries.
  58. 10.1017/CBO9780511607653.010 · DOI
  59. 10.1017/CBO9780511607653.005 · DOI
  60. Wilson, 1917, Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians.
  61. Sutlive, 1978, The Iban of Sarawak: Chronicle of a Vanishing World.
  62. Isbell, 2000, The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective,, 243
  63. Amit, 2002, The Trouble with Community: Anthropological Reflections on Movement, Identity and Collectivity,, 13
  64. 10.1525/aa.1958.60.2.02a00080 · DOI
  65. Arzigian, 1994, The Gunderson Site: An Oneota Village and Cemetery in La Crosse, Wisconsin., Journal of the IowaArche-ological Society, 41, 3
  66. O’Gorman, 1996, Domestic Economics and Mortuary Practices: A Gendered View of Oneota Social Organization
  67. Adler, 2002, The Archaeology of Tribal Societies,, 155, 10.2307/j.ctv8bt29z.13 · DOI
  68. Anderson, 1983, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.
  69. Austin, 1977, Iban Migration: Patterns of Mobility and Employment in the 20th Century
  70. Coudart, 1991, Between Bands and States,, 395
  71. 10.1080/00438243.1986.9979989 · DOI
  72. Mason, 1993, Oneota and Winnebago Ethnogenesis: An Overview, Wisconsin Archeologist, 74, 400
  73. Durrenberger, 1992, The Dynamics of Medieval Iceland: Political Econ omy and Literature.
  74. Redfield, 1956, Peasant Society and Culture.
  75. Cheruvelil, 2005, Ritual Behavior Material Dynamics Among the Western Wisconsin Oneota
  76. Gallagher, 1994, Agricultural Origins and Development in the Midcontinent,, 171
  77. Gallagher, 1992, Phase III Excavations at the Tremaine Site, 47LC95, the Midvale Interceptor Project.
  78. Gallagher, 1981, The Overhead Site, 47-Lc-20.
  79. 10.4324/9780203323373 · DOI
  80. Boszhardt, 1994, Oneota Group Continuity at La Crosse: The Brice Prairie, Pammel Creek and Valley View Phases, Wisconsin Archeologist, 79, 196
  81. Low, 2003, The Anthropology of Space and Place: Locating Culture,, 1
  82. Green, 1993, Examining Protohistoric Depopulation in the Upper Midwest, Wisconsin Archeologist, 74, 284
  83. Heidenreich, 1971, Huronia: A History and Geography of the Huron Indians 1600–1650.
  84. Wedel, 1959, Oneota Sites on the Upper Iowa River, Missouri Archaeologist, 21, 2
  85. 10.2307/279363 · DOI
  86. Horning, 2000, The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective,, 210
  87. Pauketat, 2000, The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective,, 16
  88. Mott, 1938, The Relation of Historic Indian Tribes to Archaeological Manifestations in Iowa, Iowa Journal of History and Politics, 36, 227
  89. Lévi-Strauss, 1982, The Way of the Masks.
  90. 10.1016/j.jaa.2005.06.002 · DOI
  91. Joyce, 2000, The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective,, 143
  92. Bourdieu, 1973, Rules and Meaning,, 98
  93. 10.1515/9783110870275 · DOI
  94. Grinker, 1994, Houses in the Rain Forest: Ethnicity and Inequality Among Farmers and Foragers in Central Africa., 10.1525/9780520915664 · DOI
  95. 10.2307/281881 · DOI
  96. Ashmore, 1988, Household and Community in the Mesoamerican Past,, 1
  97. Fenton, 1978, Northeast,, 296
  98. Freeman, 1955, Report on the Iban of Sarawak: lban Social Organization.
  99. Keeley, 2002, The Archaeology of Tribal Societies,, 384, 10.2307/j.ctv8bt29z.21 · DOI
  100. Barth, 1994, The Anthropology of Ethnicity: Beyond “Ethnic Groups and Boundaries,”, 11
  101. Boszhardt, 2000, Mounds, Modoc, and Mesoamerica: Papers in Honor of Melvin L. Fowler,, 361
  102. 10.1017/CBO9780511607653 · DOI
  103. 10.1023/A:1022374312372 · DOI
  104. Hill, 1970, Broken K Pueblo: Prehistoric Social Organization in the American Southwest.
  105. Morgan, 1881, Houses and House-Life of the American Aborigines.
  106. Gallagher, 1982, The 1980–1982 La Crosse Area Archaeological Survey.
  107. Gillespie, 2000a, Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies,, 1
  108. Murdock, 1949, Social Structure.
  109. Redfield, 1953, The Primitive Worldandlts Transformation.
  110. Creed, 2006, The Seductions of Community: Emancipations, Oppressions, Quandaries,, 3
  111. 10.1017/CBO9780511607851.004 · DOI
  112. 10.1179/mca.2005.004 · DOI
  113. Tuck, 1978, Northeast,, 322
  114. Vradenburg, 1993, Skeletal Analysis of the Tremaine Site
  115. Wedel, 1976, Ethnohistory: Its Payoffs and Pitfalls for Iowa Archeologists, Journal of the Iowa Archeological Society, 23, 1
  116. Yaeger, 2000, The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective,, 123
  117. Stevenson, 1994, Chronological and Settlement Aspects of the Valley View Site (47Lc-34), Wisconsin Archeologist, 75, 237
  118. Trigger, 1976, The Children of Aataentsic: A History of the Huron People to 1660.
  119. Trigger, 1990, The Huron: Farmers of the North.
  120. Tooker, 1984, Extending the Rafters: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Iroquoian Studies,, 109
  121. Sandin, 1980, Iban
  122. Lévi-Strauss, 1987, Anthropology and Myth: Lectures 1951–1982.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Gorman, J. A.
Venue
American Antiquity
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2010-07
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
571-597
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
DOI
10.7183/0002-7316.75.3.571
Cited by
19
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 2395 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review