Cited by 6Geophysical Methods and ApplicationsArchaeological Research and Protection3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Micro-scale mapping using ground penetrating radar: an example from Room 28, Pueblo Bonito, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico

Sturm, Jennie O., Crown, Patricia L.·2015·Advances in Archaeological Practice

Abstract

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has become a common method for mapping archaeological sites in the American Southwest. A less tested use for this method is to survey architectural spaces within larger pueblos to map features that may relate to the function, use, and abandonment of a specific room. In Chaco Canyon, GPR was used in a room (Room 28) within Pueblo Bonito prior to excavation to determine the presence and depth of buried features. Comparison with excavation results provides a means to evaluate how well this method mapped features in this small space. Three categories of features within this room, posts/postholes, entryways, and burned materials, were successfully identified in the GPR maps. By comparing this GPR survey with the subsequent excavation, we determined how GPR reflected these architectural features, allowing us to develop a set of expectations for using this method to identify similar features in other interior pueblo rooms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7183/2326-3768.3.2.124

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our investigations of the refuse mounds, Room 28 and the Wetherill Homestead that have employed new dating techniques and analytical methods, such as ground-penetrating radar, provide an enhanced understanding of the complex sub-surface deposits and the warren of still-intact rooms throughout the great house.

    “Our investigations of the refuse mounds, Room 28 and the Wetherill Homestead that have employed new dating techniques and analytical methods, such as ground-penetrating radar (Sturm & Crown 2015), nevertheless provide an enhanced understanding of the complex sub-surface deposits and the warren of still-intact rooms throughout the great house.”

    From The complex history of Pueblo Bonito and its interpretation (2018) · cites this paper as Sturm & Crown 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sturm, J. O., & Crown, P. L.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Published
2015-05
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
124-135
ISSN
2326-3768 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2569578165
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in Archaeological Practice (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Endowment for the Humanities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
ground penetrating radar, archaeological site mapping, Chaco Canyon, Pueblo Bonito, pueblos, architectural elements, postholes, entryways, feature detection, non-invasive survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review