The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inefficient procurement processes undermine access to medicines in the Western Cape Province of South Africa
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: South Africa (SA) has experienced several stock-outs of life-saving medicines for the treatment of major chronic infectious and non-communicable diseases in the public sector. OBJECTIVE: To identify the causes of stock-outs and to illustrate how they undermine access to medicines (ATM) in the Western Cape Province, SA. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted with a sample of over 70 key informants (frontline health workers, sub-structure and provincial health service managers). We employed the critical incident technique to identify significant occurrences in our context, the consequences of which impacted on access to medicines during a defined period. Stock-outs were identified as one such incident, and we explored when, where and why they occurred, in order to inform policy and practice. RESULTS: Medicines procurement is a centralised function in SA. Health service managers unanimously agreed that stock-outs resulted from the following inefficiencies at the central level: (i) delays in awarding of pharmaceutical tenders; (ii) absence of contracts for certain medicines appearing on provincial code lists; and (iii) suppliers' inability to satisfy contractual agreements. The recurrence of stock-outs had implications at multiple levels: (i) health facility operations; (ii) the Chronic Dispensing Unit (CDU), which prepacks medicines for over 300 000 public sector patients; and (iii) community-based medicines distribution systems, which deliver the CDU's prepacked medicines to non-health facilities nearer to patient homes. For instance, stock-outs resulted in omission of certain medicines from CDU parcels that were delivered to health facilities. This increased workload and caused frustration for frontline health workers who were expected to dispense omitted medicines manually. According to frontline health workers, this translated into longer waiting times for patients and associated dissatisfaction. In some instances, patients were asked to return for undispensed medication at a later date, which could potentially affect adherence to treatment and therapeutic outcomes. Stock-outs therefore undermined the intended benefits of ATM strategies. CONCLUSION: Addressing the procurement challenges, most notably timeous tender awards and supplier performance management, is critical for successful implementation of ATM strategies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pharmacists reported being given incorrect information about stock availability, leading to medicine shortages.
“In addition, pharmacists reported being given incorrect information about stock availability leading to medicine shortages similar to previous findings in South Africa [25].”
From Medicine shortages and challenges with the procurement process among public sector hospitals in South Africa; findings and implications (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Shortages of medicines: a complex global challenge
Gray, A., & Manasse, H. (2012) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.11.101303 · Cited by 136 · cited 1×
“Evidence suggests that the causes vary greatly and include issues that government agencies often do not have control over, such as supplier shortages.[1] Stock-outs appear to be worsening with time globally, which presents a threat to patient wellbeing and could result in loss of life.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modisakeng, C., Matlala, M., Godman, B., & Meyer, J. C. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05080-1 · Cited by 130
“We are aware that there have been recent programs to help reduce potential medicine shortages in the public sector in South Africa [22] building on concerns in some provinces [25].”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Magadzire, B. P., Ward, K., Leng, H. M. J., & Sanders, D.
- Affiliations
- University of the Western Cape (ZA)
- Venue
- South African Medical Journal
- Published
- 2017-06-30
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 581
- ISSN
- 0256-9574 (ISSN-L)
- 2078-5135
- OpenAlex
- W2727801247
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- South African Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- International Development Research Centre
- European Commission (242262)
- University of the Western Cape
- Belgisch Ontwikkelingsagentschap
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
- Keywords
- medicine stock-outs, drug procurement, access to medicines, supplier performance management, public health facilities, medication adherence, Western Cape
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Drug and Narcotic Control, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, South Africa, Public Sector, Drugs, Essential, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research, Medication Therapy Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review