Cited by 24Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHealthcare Systems and ReformsPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inefficient procurement processes undermine access to medicines in the Western Cape Province of South Africa

Open access
Magadzire, Bvudzai P, Ward, Kim, Leng, Henry M J, Sanders, David·2017·South African Medical Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: South Africa (SA) has experienced several stock-outs of life-saving medicines for the treatment of major chronic infectious and non-communicable diseases in the public sector. OBJECTIVE: To identify the causes of stock-outs and to illustrate how they undermine access to medicines (ATM) in the Western Cape Province, SA. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted with a sample of over 70 key informants (frontline health workers, sub-structure and provincial health service managers). We employed the critical incident technique to identify significant occurrences in our context, the consequences of which impacted on access to medicines during a defined period. Stock-outs were identified as one such incident, and we explored when, where and why they occurred, in order to inform policy and practice. RESULTS: Medicines procurement is a centralised function in SA. Health service managers unanimously agreed that stock-outs resulted from the following inefficiencies at the central level: (i) delays in awarding of pharmaceutical tenders; (ii) absence of contracts for certain medicines appearing on provincial code lists; and (iii) suppliers' inability to satisfy contractual agreements. The recurrence of stock-outs had implications at multiple levels: (i) health facility operations; (ii) the Chronic Dispensing Unit (CDU), which prepacks medicines for over 300 000 public sector patients; and (iii) community-based medicines distribution systems, which deliver the CDU's prepacked medicines to non-health facilities nearer to patient homes. For instance, stock-outs resulted in omission of certain medicines from CDU parcels that were delivered to health facilities. This increased workload and caused frustration for frontline health workers who were expected to dispense omitted medicines manually. According to frontline health workers, this translated into longer waiting times for patients and associated dissatisfaction. In some instances, patients were asked to return for undispensed medication at a later date, which could potentially affect adherence to treatment and therapeutic outcomes. Stock-outs therefore undermined the intended benefits of ATM strategies. CONCLUSION: Addressing the procurement challenges, most notably timeous tender awards and supplier performance management, is critical for successful implementation of ATM strategies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7196/samj.2017.v107i7.11356

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • Shortages of medicines: a complex global challenge

    Gray, A., & Manasse, H. (2012) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.11.101303 · Cited by 136 · cited 1×

    “Evidence suggests that the causes vary greatly and include issues that government agencies often do not have control over, such as supplier shortages.[1] Stock-outs appear to be worsening with time globally, which presents a threat to patient wellbeing and could result in loss of life.”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Magadzire, B. P., Ward, K., Leng, H. M. J., & Sanders, D.
Affiliations
University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Venue
South African Medical Journal
Published
2017-06-30
Volume
107
Issue
7
Pages
581
ISSN
  • 0256-9574 (ISSN-L)
  • 2078-5135
OpenAlex
W2727801247
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • South African Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • International Development Research Centre
  • European Commission (242262)
  • University of the Western Cape
  • Belgisch Ontwikkelingsagentschap
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
medicine stock-outs, drug procurement, access to medicines, supplier performance management, public health facilities, medication adherence, Western Cape
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Drug and Narcotic Control, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, South Africa, Public Sector, Drugs, Essential, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research, Medication Therapy Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review