Cited by 58Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceInnovation, Technology, and SocietySustainable Development and Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Le champ des sustainability transitions : origines, analyses et pratiques de recherche

Open access
Audet, René·2016·Cahiers de recherche sociologique

Abstract

Le champ des sustainability transitions est peu connu dans les cercles universitaires francophones, demeurant surtout, à ce jour, une affaire européenne. L’objectif de cet article est donc avant tout d’introduire ce champ au monde francophone : il s’agit de présenter les sustainability transitions , ses principales écoles, leurs problématiques théoriques et empiriques, leurs pratiques méthodologiques et leurs critiques. L’article est organisé autour des trois problématiques centrales du champ, soit : les problèmes de l’incertitude, de la complexité et de la réflexivité dans la gouvernance du développement durable, le fort degré de verrouillage des principaux systèmes sociotechniques empêchant leur « transition vers la durabilité », et le défi plus méthodologique du pilotage du changement et des transitions. L’article présente ces trois problématiques en montrant leurs ancrages dans différentes filiations théoriques des sciences sociales et des sciences de l’environnement, et en propose finalement une critique épistémologique et politique qui invite à réfléchir davantage aux conséquences des sustainability transitions sur les transformations actuelles des sociétés dans le contexte des crises écologique et climatique.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7202/1036207ar

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Audet, R.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Audet, René
Venue
Cahiers de recherche sociologique
Published
2016-04-25
Issue
58
Pages
73-93
ISSN
  • 0831-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1923-5771
OpenAlex
W2473204776
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Cahiers de recherche sociologique (publishedVersion)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Policies
Keywords
sustainability transitions, sustainable development governance, uncertainty, complexity, reflexivity, socio-technical systems, change management, epistemological critique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review