Cited by 13Linguistic and Sociocultural StudiesMultilingual Education and PolicyLinguistic Variation and Morphology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

L’identité assignée : du lieu et ses manifestations discursives

Open access
Boudreau, Annette·2019·Minorités linguistiques et société

Abstract

L’auteure analyse les liens entre le lieu, les discriminations linguistiques et les processus de minorisation à la base des hiérarchies et des inégalités sociales entre locuteurs francophones au Canada. Plus particulièrement, elle montre comment les francophones bilingues des régions périphériques qui font usage de pratiques mélangées du français et de l’anglais – dans des slogans, dans des chansons – sont souvent ciblés comme exemples à ne pas imiter dans les médias nationaux pour montrer l’appauvrissement du français au pays. Considérés comme des francophones illégitimes par les tenants de ces discours, certains locuteurs visés intériorisent ce sentiment et le tiennent pour naturel et allant de soi ; ils se cantonnent dans le silence pour éviter de se faire juger. D’autres, surtout les artistes, tentent de répondre à ces discours hégémoniques par des stratégies diverses, dont la mise en scène des traits stigmatisés. L’Acadie servira d’exemple pour illustrer ces différentes manifestations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7202/1066521ar

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lippi-Green, Rosina (1997), English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States, Londres, Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boudreau, A.
Affiliations
Université de Moncton (CA)
Corresponding author
Boudreau, Annette
Venue
Minorités linguistiques et société
Published
2019-12-19
Issue
12
Pages
51-66
ISSN
1927-8632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996210396
Cited by
13
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Minorités linguistiques et société (publishedVersion)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
language discrimination, francophone identity, bilingualism, social hierarchy, social inequality, media representation, hegemonic discourse, stigmatization, silence, artists, Acadia, French language decline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review