Cited by 1Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsHealth, Medicine and SocietyPsychiatric care and mental health services

Analyse phénoménologique des expériences de soutien à l’exercice des droits en soins psychiatriques

Open access
Pelosse, David, Pariseau-Legault, Pierre·2022·Science of Nursing and Health Practices

Abstract

Analyse phénoménologique des expériences de soutien à l’exercice des droits en soins psychiatriques. An article from journal Science of Nursing and Health Practices / Science infirmière et pratiques en santé (Supplément. Spécial Congrès mondial du Secrétariat international des infirmières et infirmiers de l’espace francophone (SIDIIEF) : 16 – 20 octobre 2022, Ottawa, Canada), on Érudit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7202/1093087ar

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients perceived coercion when they were forced to accept unit transfers and medication without any legal justification.

    “or when they were forced to accept unit transfers and medication without any legal justification [152].”
  • Patients described restrictions such as prohibitions on smoking, coffee, or going outside, the inability to use a phone, and needing staff permission for basic needs as profound losses of control.

    “Patients described restrictions such as prohibitions on smoking, coffee, or going outside [102,142], the inability to use a phone [152], and needing staff permission for basic needs [114,141] as profound losses of control.”
  • Rigid rules and routines were the most consistently reported as restrictive in the literature.

    “it was the rigid rules and routines that were most consistently reported as restrictive in the literature [51,89,102,104,114,141,142,145,149,152,153,161].”
  • These studies shed light on how structural factors such as rigid ward rules, locked units, lack of privacy, resource scarcity, and dehumanizing practices deeply influence individuals' perceptions of coercion.

    “For instance, these studies shed light on how structural factors such as rigid ward rules, locked units, lack of privacy, resource scarcity, and dehumanizing practices deeply influence individuals’ perceptions of coercion [51,89,102,104,114,141,142,145,149,152,153,161].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pelosse, D., & Pariseau-Legault, P.
Affiliations
Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA)
Venue
Science of Nursing and Health Practices
Published
2022-10-27
Volume
5
Pages
27-27
ISSN
2561-7516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307630920
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science of Nursing and Health Practices (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
patient rights, psychiatric nursing, patient support, lived experience, patient advocacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review