Analyse phénoménologique des expériences de soutien à l’exercice des droits en soins psychiatriques
Open accessAbstract
Analyse phénoménologique des expériences de soutien à l’exercice des droits en soins psychiatriques. An article from journal Science of Nursing and Health Practices / Science infirmière et pratiques en santé (Supplément. Spécial Congrès mondial du Secrétariat international des infirmières et infirmiers de l’espace francophone (SIDIIEF) : 16 – 20 octobre 2022, Ottawa, Canada), on Érudit.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients perceived coercion when they were forced to accept unit transfers and medication without any legal justification.
“or when they were forced to accept unit transfers and medication without any legal justification [152].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [152]
Patients described restrictions such as prohibitions on smoking, coffee, or going outside, the inability to use a phone, and needing staff permission for basic needs as profound losses of control.
“Patients described restrictions such as prohibitions on smoking, coffee, or going outside [102,142], the inability to use a phone [152], and needing staff permission for basic needs [114,141] as profound losses of control.”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [152]
Rigid rules and routines were the most consistently reported as restrictive in the literature.
“it was the rigid rules and routines that were most consistently reported as restrictive in the literature [51,89,102,104,114,141,142,145,149,152,153,161].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [152]
These studies shed light on how structural factors such as rigid ward rules, locked units, lack of privacy, resource scarcity, and dehumanizing practices deeply influence individuals' perceptions of coercion.
“For instance, these studies shed light on how structural factors such as rigid ward rules, locked units, lack of privacy, resource scarcity, and dehumanizing practices deeply influence individuals’ perceptions of coercion [51,89,102,104,114,141,142,145,149,152,153,161].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [152]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review
Lessard-Deschênes, C., Pariseau-Legault, P., Billé, V., Sergerie-Richard, S., Hudson, E., Silva, B., Drouin, J.-S., Désilets, M., & Goulet, M.-H. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13151868 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Pelosse, D., & Pariseau-Legault, P.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA)
- ORCID
- Pelosse, David
- Venue
- Science of Nursing and Health Practices
- Publisher
- Université de Montréal libraries
- Published
- 2022-10-27
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 27-27
- ISSN
- 2561-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4307630920
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Science of Nursing and Health Practices (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- patient rights, psychiatric nursing, patient support, lived experience, patient advocacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review