The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Actinomycetes, promising tools to control plant diseases and to promote plant growth
Open accessAbstract
Actinomycetes represent a high proportion of the soil microbial biomass and have the capacity to produce a wide variety of antibiotics and of extracellular enzymes. Several strains of actinomycetes have been found to protect plants against plant diseases. This review focuses on the potential of actinomycetes as (a) source of agroactive compounds, (b) plant growth promoting organisms, and (c) biocontrol tools of plant diseases. This review also addresses examples of biological control of fungal and bacterial plant pathogens by actinomycetes species which have already reached the market or are likely to be exploited commercially within the next few years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores
Schwyn, B., & Neilands, J. B. (1987) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9 · Cited by 6,549
The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria
Glick, B. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m95-015 · Cited by 2,649
Introduction of Soil Microbiology
ALEXANDER, M. (1962) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196201000-00034 · Cited by 2,545
Biological Control of Soilborne Plant Pathogens in the Rhizosphere with Bacteria
Weller, D. M. (1988) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.26.090188.002115 · Cited by 1,763
Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
Kloepper, J. W., Leong, J., Teintze, M., & Schroth, M. N. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/286885a0 · Cited by 1,559
The Prokaryotes : a handbook on habitats, isolation, and identification of bacteria
Starr, M. P. (1981) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 1,182
Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity
Kloepper, J. W., Lifshitz, R., & Zablotowicz, R. M. (1989) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/0167-7799(89)90057-7 · Cited by 957
Tien, T. M., Gaskins, M. H., & Hubbell, D. H. (1979) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.37.5.1016-1024.1979 · Cited by 902
Introduction to Soil Microbiology
Schlichting, H. E. (1978) · Phycologia · doi:10.2216/i0031-8884-17-4-447a.1 · Cited by 728
Biocontrol of plant disease: a (Gram-) positive perspective
Emmert, E. (1999) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-1097(98)00570-9 · Cited by 656
Cited by
Backer, R., Rokem, J. S., Ilangumaran, G., Lamont, J., Praslickova, D., Ricci, E., Subramanian, S., & Smith, D. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01473 · Cited by 2,114
Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development
Boer, W. D., Folman, L. B., Summerbell, R. C., & Boddy, L. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.005 · Cited by 1,867
El-Tarabily, K. A., & Sivasithamparam, K. (2006) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.12.017 · Cited by 306
Kim, B.-H., Ramanan, R., Cho, D.-H., Oh, H.-M., & Kim, H.-S. (2014) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.07.015 · Cited by 272
Dimkpa, C. O., Svatoš, A., Dabrowska, P., Schmidt, A., Boland, W., & Kothe, E. (2008) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.079 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Doumbou, C. L., Hamby Salove, M. K., Crawford, D. L., & Beaulieu, C.
- Venue
- Phytoprotection
- Publisher
- Consortium Erudit
- Published
- 2005-04-12
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 85-102
- ISSN
- 0031-9511 (ISSN-L)
- 1710-1603
- OpenAlex
- W2099038909
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Actinomycetes, promising tools to control plant diseases and to promote plant growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7202/706219ar
- The paper
- Doumbou, C. L., Hamby Salove, M. K., Crawford, D. L., & Beaulieu, C. (2005). Actinomycetes, promising tools to control plant diseases and to promote plant growth. Phytoprotection. https://doi.org/10.7202/706219ar
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
