Cited by 62Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Case Reports: STAIR for Strengthening Social Support and Relationships Among Veterans With Military Sexual Trauma and PTSD

Cloitre, Marylene, Jackson, Christie, Schmidt, Janet A.·2016·Military Medicine

Abstract

Military sexual trauma (MST) is associated with high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and multiple comorbid symptoms. In addition, women Veterans with MST report negative perceptions of social support, poor relationships, and difficulties in social and role functioning. Treatments for PTSD do not provide interventions to improve social or relationship functioning and do not consistently produce positive benefits regarding these outcomes. This article presents a series of case studies in which an intervention focused on building social support and relationship skills is delivered to Veterans with PTSD and MST. The intervention, Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) promotes social engagement and skills that support greater role functioning. It can be used as a stand-alone treatment, as an adjunctive intervention to PTSD therapies or as part of a combination therapy in which skills precede trauma-focused work (STAIR Narrative Therapy). Further investigation is suggested to determine the added benefits of incorporating skills building to PTSD or other diagnosis-specific interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7205/milmed-d-15-00209

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions focused on building healthy relationships, including availability and satisfaction with social support, may be an important adjunct to trauma-focused treatments for interpersonal trauma survivors with PTSD.

    “Moreover, our findings provide additional support that interventions focused on building healthy relationships, including availability and satisfaction with social support, may be an important adjunct to trauma-focused treatments for interpersonal trauma survivors with PTSD (Cloitre, Jackson, & Schmidt, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cloitre, M., Jackson, C., & Schmidt, J. A.
Affiliations
  • VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Venue
Military Medicine
Published
2016-02
Volume
181
Issue
2
Pages
e183-e187
ISSN
  • 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-613X
OpenAlex
W2254111660
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Military Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
military sexual trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, women veterans, social support, interpersonal relationships, relationship skills, role functioning, social engagement, adjunctive intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Offenses, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Narrative Therapy, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review