The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Telesurgery With Miniature Robots to Leverage Surgical Expertise in Distributed Expeditionary Environments
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the capability of performing telesurgery via radio transmission for military arenas where wired internet connections may not be practical. Most existing robotic surgery systems are too large to effectively deploy with first responders. The miniature surgical platform in this study consists of a multifunctional robot suite that can fit easily into a briefcase. METHODS: The focus of this study is to explore the implications of radio control of the robot. The hypothesis is that an in vivo robot and its control boards can be controlled using off-the-shelf wireless components. An experiment was designed with off-the-shelf wireless components to test the capability of our newest generation of miniature surgical robot to become battery-operated and wireless. RESULTS: Wireless transmission of control signals has provided proof of concept and has exposed areas of the software that can be built upon to improve responsiveness. Wireless transmission of the video feed can be adequately performed with basic off-the-shelf components.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A mini-robot was created by Rentschler et al. and placed within the abdominal cavity.”
From Artificial Intelligence in the Military: An Overview of the Capabilities, Applications, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [107]
In the citing paper
“Similar to the fexible-tip laparoscopes on the robotic arms of the da Vinci model, the robot's surgical arms have a wide range of motion (Figure 24(a)).”
From Artificial Intelligence in the Military: An Overview of the Capabilities, Applications, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [107]
Citations
Cites
Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial
Veldkamp, R. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70221-7 · Cited by 2,339
Death on the battlefield (2001–2011)
Eastridge, B. J., Mabry, R. L., Seguin, P. G., Cantrell, J. A., Tops, T., Uribe, P., Mallett, O., Zubko, T., Oetjen-Gerdes, L., Rasmussen, T. E., et al. (2012) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e3182755dcc · Cited by 1,749
The Intuitive/sup TM/ telesurgery system: overview and application
Guthart, G. S., & Salisbury, J. K. (2002) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/robot.2000.844121 · Cited by 920
Died of Wounds on the Battlefield: Causation and Implications for Improving Combat Casualty Care
Eastridge, B. J., Hardin, M. O., Cantrell, J. A., Oetjen-Gerdes, L., Zubko, T., Mallak, C. T., Wade, C. E., Simmons, J. W., Mace, J., Mabry, R. L., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e318221147b · Cited by 528
The Effect of a Golden Hour Policy on the Morbidity and Mortality of Combat Casualties
Kotwal, R. S., Howard, J. T., Orman, J. A., Tarpey, B. W., Bailey, J. A., Champion, H. R., Mabry, R. L., Holcomb, J. B., & Gross, K. R. (2015) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3104 · Cited by 475
Raven-II: An Open Platform for Surgical Robotics Research
Hannaford, B., Rosén, J., Friedman, D., King, H. H., Roan, P. R., Cheng, L., Glozman, D., Ma, J., Kosari, S. N., & White, L. W. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2228858 · Cited by 373
Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery
Moorthy, K., Munz, Y., Dosis, A., Hernández, J. D., Martin, S., Bello, F., Rockall, T., & Darzi, A. W. (2004) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2 · Cited by 328
Single-Incision Versus Standard Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy
Champagne, B. J., Papaconstantinou, H. T., Parmar, S. S., Nagle, D. A., Young‐Fadok, T. M., Lee, E. C., & Delaney, C. P. (2011) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182378442 · Cited by 195
An articulated universal joint based flexible access robot for minimally invasive surgery
Shang, J., Noonan, D. P., Payne, C. J., Clark, J., Sodergren, M. H., Darzi, A. W., & Yang, G. (2011) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2011.5980261 · Cited by 156
Transcontinental Telesurgical Nephrectomy Using the da Vinci Robot in a Porcine Model
Sterbis, J. R., Hanly, E. J., Herman, B., Marohn, M. R., Broderick, T. J., Shih, S. P., Harnett, B. M., Doarn, C. R., & Schenkman, N. S. (2008) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.027 · Cited by 110
Bajo, A., Goldman, R. E., Wang, L., Fowler, D. L., & Simaan, N. (2012) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2012.6224986 · Cited by 106
A Compact Modular Teleoperated Robotic System for Laparoscopic Surgery
Berkelman, P. J., & Ma, J. (2009) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364909104276 · Cited by 98
Teleoperation in surgical robotics – network latency effects on surgical performance
Lum, M. J. H., Rosén, J., King, H. H., Friedman, D. C. W., Lendvay, T. S., Wright, A. S., D, M. N. S. M., & Hannaford, B. (2009) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2009.5333120 · Cited by 78
Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery
Lehman, A. C., Wood, N. A., Farritor, S. M., Goede, M. R., & Oleynikov, D. (2010) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1143-6 · Cited by 75
Self-citationShang, J., Payne, C. J., Clark, J., Noonan, D. P., Kwok, K., Darzi, A. W., & Yang, G. (2012) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6385567 · Cited by 75
Kobayashi, Y., Sekiguchi, Y., Noguchi, T., Takahashi, Y., Liu, Q., Oguri, S., Toyoda, K., Uemura, M., Ieiri, S., Tomikawa, M., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery · doi:10.1002/rcs.1600 · Cited by 59
Pre‐clinical remote telesurgery trial of a da Vinci telesurgery prototype
Nguan, C. Y. C., Miller, B., Patel, R. V., Luke, P. P. W., & Schlachta, C. M. (2008) · International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery · doi:10.1002/rcs.210 · Cited by 59
A novel robotic system for single-port laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience
Petroni, G., Niccolini, M., Caccavaro, S., Quaglia, C., Menciassi, A., Schostek, S., Basili, G., Goletti, O., Schurr, M. O., & Dario, P. (2013) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2690-9 · Cited by 39
Design of a Compact Robotic Manipulator for Single-Port Laparoscopy
Quaglia, C., Petroni, G., Niccolini, M., Caccavaro, S., Dario, P., & Menciassi, A. (2014) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4027782 · Cited by 34
Laparoendoscopic single‐site surgery using a multi‐functional miniaturein vivorobot
Wortman, T. D., Strabala, K., Lehman, A. C., Farritor, S. M., & Oleynikov, D. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery · doi:10.1002/rcs.362 · Cited by 31
Self-citationLessons learned using the insertable robotic effector platform (IREP) for single port access surgery
Simaan, N., Bajo, A., Reiter, A., Wang, L., Allen, P., & Fowler, D. L. (2013) · Journal of Robotic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11701-013-0400-9 · Cited by 31
Real-time control architecture of a novel Single-Port lapaRoscopy bimaNual roboT (SPRINT)
Niccolini, M., Petroni, G., Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2012) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2012.6224984 · Cited by 22
Comparison of Long-Term Follow Up of Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy for Transverse Colon Cancer
Agarwal, S., Gincherman, M., Birnbaum, E. H., Fleshman, J. W., & Mutch, M. G. (2015) · Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings · doi:10.1080/08998280.2015.11929254 · Cited by 11
Comparative Assessment of a Novel Optical Human-Machine Interface for Laparoscopic Telesurgery
Despinoy, F., Sánchez, A., Zemiti, N., Jannin, P., & Poignet, P. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07521-1_3 · Cited by 10
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancements in robotic surgery: innovations, challenges and future prospects
Chatterjee, S., Das, S., Ganguly, K., & Mandal, D. (2024) · Journal of Robotic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01801-w · Cited by 143
Rashid, A. B., Kausik, A. K., Al Hassan Sunny, A., & Bappy, M. H. (2023) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1155/2023/8676366 · Cited by 143
“Once the port is deployed locally, as depicted in (Figure 24(b)), the scope and arms can be controlled wirelessly from anywhere in the world [107, 108].”
BackgroundRobotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper
de’Angelis, N., Khan, J. S., Marchegiani, F., Bianchi, G., Aisoni, F., Alberti, D., Ansaloni, L., Biffl, W. L., Chiara, O., Ceccarelli, G., et al. (2022) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-022-00410-6 · Cited by 148
Telemedicine and telerobotics: from science fiction to reality
Evans, C. R., Medina, M. G., & Dwyer, A. M. (2018) · Updates in Surgery · doi:10.1007/s13304-018-0574-9 · Cited by 64
PRECISION IMPROVEMENT AND DELAY REDUCTION IN SURGICAL TELEROBOTICS
Manoharan, J. S., & Ponraj, D. N. (2019) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Capsule Networks · doi:10.36548/jaicn.2019.1.004 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Reichenbach, M., Frederick, T., Cubrich, L., Bircher, W., Bills, N., Morien, M., Farritor, S., & Oleynikov, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Military Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 316-321
- ISSN
- 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-613X
- OpenAlex
- W2597183528
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Military Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Center for Advanced Surgical Technology, University of Nebraska Medical Center
- U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Keywords
- telesurgery, radio control, wireless control, first responders, video transmission
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Equipment Design, Humans, Robotics, Warfare, Telemedicine, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Surgeons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
