The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commodity Market Integration, 1500–2000
Open accessAbstract
This chapter provides an introduction to what is known about trends in international commodity market integration during the second half of the second millennium. Throughout, the focus is on intercontinental trade, since it is the emergence of large-scale trade between the continents that has especially distinguished the centuries following the voyages of da Gama and Columbus. The chapter is organized as follows. Section 1.2 discusses world trade before 1500. Section 1.3 covers world trade from 1500–1780. Section 1.4 focuses on the impact of the French and Napoleonic Wars on trade. Sections 1.5 and 1.6 discuss world trade from 1815–1914 and 1914–2000, respectively, while Section 1.7 concludes. A commentary is also included at the end of the chapter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ocean Freight Rates and Productivity, 1740–1913: The Primacy of Mechanical Invention Reaffirmed
Harley, C. K. (1988) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050700006641 · Cited by 340
Cited by
De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research
Witt, M. A. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7 · Cited by 680
The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870-1939
Estevadeordal, A., Frantz, B., & Taylor, A. M. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303321675419 · Cited by 368
Trading Population for Productivity: Theory and Evidence
GALOR, O., & MOUNTFORD, A. (2008) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00501.x · Cited by 313
Globalization in Historical Perspective
Bordo, M. D., Taylor, A. M., & Williamson, J. G. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226065991.001.0001 · Cited by 297
From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory
Galor, O. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.651526 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Findlay, R., & O'Rourke, K. H.
- Venue
- Globalization in Historical Perspective
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 13-62
- OpenAlex
- W3123583798
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.06
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commodity Market Integration, 1500–2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7208/chicago/9780226065991.003.0002
- The paper
- Findlay, R., & O'Rourke, K. H. (2003). Commodity Market Integration, 1500–2000. Globalization in Historical Perspective. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226065991.003.0002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.