Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 117Veterinary Equine Medical ResearchFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesCultural and Mythological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neither Donkey nor Horse: Medicine in the Struggle over China's Modernity

Lei, Sean Hsiang-lin·2014·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226169910.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

2 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lei, S. H.-L.
Corresponding author
Lei, Sean Hsiang-lin
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
2014
OpenAlex
W4242051466
Cited by
117
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11
FWCI
11.48
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.