The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society
Abstract
This chapter argues that the tunt against penal-welfarism took a ‘reactionary’, all-encompassing form because underlying the debate about crime and punishment was a fundamental shift of interests and sensibilities. This historical shift, which had both political and cultural dimensions, gave rise to new group relations and social attitudes—attitudes that were most sharply defined in relation to the problems of crime, welfare, and social order. The chapter begins with the most basic transformative forces of modern times: the economic force of capitalist competition and the political struggle for social and political equality. The coming of late modernity also had immediate practical consequences for the institutions of crime control and criminal justice, quite aside from the impact that higher crime rates would eventually have. In the watershed period, effective crime control came to be viewed as a matter of imposing more controls, increasing disincentives, and, if necessary, segregating the dangerous sector of the population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The initiative offers opportunities for the men to support the interest of the surrogate victim community, while also increasing their feelings of self-worth and opportunities for strengths-based knowledge sharing.
“the initiative offers opportunities for the men to support the interest of the surrogate victim community, while also increasing their feelings of self-worth and opportunities for strengths-based knowledge sharing (Garland, 2001, p. 181).”
From "Healing on Both Sides": Strengthening the Effectiveness of Prison–Indigenous Community Partnerships Through Reciprocity and Investment (2020) · cites this paper as Garland, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychologising Jekyll, Demonising Hyde: The Strange Case of Criminal Responsibility
Lacey, N. (2010) · Criminal Law and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11572-010-9091-8 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Varcoe, C., Brown, H., Timler, K., Taylor, M., & Straus, E. (2020) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2020.11.3.8064 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garland, D.
- Corresponding author
- Garland, David
- ORCID
- Garland, David
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 609-627
- OpenAlex
- W1603770518
- Cited by
- 5,364
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 224 · 2025: 213 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 218 · 2021: 231 · 2020: 261 · 2019: 320 · 2018: 286 · 2017: 279 · 2016: 256 · 2015: 225 · 2014: 230 · 2013: 313 · 2012: 241
- FWCI
- 1300.75
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Decadence, Literature, and Society
- Keywords
- penal welfarism, crime control, criminal justice, late modernity, capitalism, social equality, social order, welfare, punishment, segregation, disincentives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review