The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Achieving Rigor in Qualitative Analysis: The Role of Active Categorization in Theory Building
Grodal, S., Anteby, M., & Holm, A. L. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0482 · Cited by 646
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12136809 · Cited by 462
The social media see-saw: Positive and negative influences on adolescents’ affective well-being
Weinstein, E. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818755634 · Cited by 282
Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge
Soedirgo, J., & Glas, A. (2020) · PS: Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096519002233 · Cited by 211
A Critical Lens on Dementia and Design in HCI
Lazar, A., Edasis, C., & Piper, A. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025522 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W2496896894
- Cited by
- 3,011
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001
- The paper
- Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition. University of Chicago Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
