Cited by 22Theological Perspectives and PracticesRace, History, and American SocietyReligion and Society Interactions

Christianity and Race in the American South: A History

Harvey, Paul·2016·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226415499.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A literal, plain-sense reading of certain biblical texts challenged these assumptions, leading abolitionist writers to adopt different reading strategies for the Bible.

    “However, as previous studies have argued, a literal, plain-sense reading of certain biblical texts challenged these assumptions, leading abolitionist writers to adopt different reading strategies for the Bible (Harvey 2016, p. 77; Lowance 2018, pp.88-90).”

Authors
Harvey, P.
Corresponding author
Harvey, Paul
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W4391672236
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 12
FWCI
3.44
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Theological Perspectives and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
Christianity, race, Southern United States, racial segregation, African American churches, white supremacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review