Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Democratic governance is being subliminally undermined by a new form of governance centered on technocratic rationality, labeled governance by impersonal systems.
“Not surprisingly, there is increasing evidence that democratic governance itself is subliminally undermined by a new form of governance, centered on technocratic rationality, and which we label governance by impersonal systems”
From Organized Immaturity in a Post-Kantian Perspective: Toward a critical theory of surveillance capitalism (2023) · cites this paper as Hayles, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Redefining Creativity in the Era of AI? Perspectives of Computer Scientists and New Media Artists
Wingström, R., Hautala, J., & Lundman, R. (2024) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2107850 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Williamson, B., Pykett, J., & Nemorin, S. (2018) · Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2018.1394421 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Scherer, A. G., & Neesham, C. (2023) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877231204083 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Material hermeneutic of digital technologies in the age of AI
Wellner, G. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00952-w · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hayles, N. K.
- Corresponding author
- Hayles, N. Katherine
- ORCID
- Hayles, N. Katherine
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W4234281577
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 101 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 32.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
