The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies, methods, and subsequent findings may or may not be accepted as valid based upon one's philosophical and theoretical orientation regarding science.
“As a result, studies, methods, and subsequent findings may or may not be accepted as valid based upon one's philosophical and theoretical orientation regarding science [97,99].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [97]
Research is theorized, conducted, analyzed, and evaluated using many different methods.
“Deriving from these various epistemologies, research is theorized, conducted, analyzed, and evaluated using many different methods [97,98].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [97]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 7,281
- Authors
- Kuhn, T. S.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1996
- OpenAlex
- W2013821356
- Cited by
- 7,281
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 155 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 310 · 2023: 274 · 2022: 274 · 2021: 265 · 2020: 453 · 2019: 319 · 2018: 329 · 2017: 260 · 2016: 296 · 2015: 340 · 2014: 359 · 2013: 417 · 2012: 359
- FWCI
- 158.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
- Keywords
- scientific revolution, paradigm shift, scientific change, history of science, scientific communities, falsifiability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
