The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation
Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A., & Hodson, J. (2024) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103745 · Cited by 1,460
The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.20180386 · Cited by 1,003
Self-citationArtificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work
Howard, J. (2019) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.23037 · Cited by 522
Artificial intelligence and industrial innovation: Evidence from German firm-level data
Rammer, C., Fernández, G. P., & Czarnitzki, D. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104555 · Cited by 489
Bouschery, S. G., Blazevic, V., & Piller, F. T. (2023) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12656 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C.
- Venue
- The Economics of Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 23-60
- OpenAlex
- W4230792396
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 119.29
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0001
- The paper
- Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
