The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Egyptian Oedipus: Athanasius Kircher and the Secrets of Antiquity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The study of languages, scripts and symbols was a thriving field which appeared to provide new perspectives on the histories of nations, and this pursuit-like antiquarian studies at the time in general-was not without mystical and esoteric dimensions (e.g. ˚ Akerman 1991, 110-12; Håkansson 2014, 307-62; Stolzenberg 2013, 19-23; see also Nagel 2011; Wood 2008).”
From Alternative Pasts and Colonial Engagements in the North: The Materiality and Meanings of the Pajala ‘Runestone’ (Vinsavaara Stone), Northern Sweden (2018) · cites this paper as Stolzenberg 2013, 19-23
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Moser, S. (2014) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9221-z · Cited by 57
Acoustemologies in Contact: Sounding Subjects and Modes of Listening in Early Modernity
Wilbourne, E., & Cusick, S. G. (2020) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0226 · Cited by 26
Herodotus in the Long Nineteenth Century
Harrison, T., & Skinner, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108562805 · Cited by 18
Athanasius Kircher’s magical instruments: an essay on ‘science’, ‘religion’ and applied metaphysics
Vermeir, K. (2007) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.03.008 · Cited by 14
Rood, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108562805.002 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Stolzenberg, D.
- Corresponding author
- Stolzenberg, Daniel
- ORCID
- Stolzenberg, Daniel
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W4213315055
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Keywords
- Oedipus, Oedipus myth, Egyptian mythology, Greek mythology, myth reception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
