Cited by 16Impact of Technology on AdolescentsStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentGender, Feminism, and Media

Factors de risc associats al sexting com a marc previ per a prevenir diferents formes derivades de victimització . Estudi de factors correlacionats amb sexting en una mostra universitària

Open access
Agustina, Jose R., Gómez-Durán, Esperanza L.·2016·IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política

Abstract

En els últims anys, la irrupció del fenomen del sexting ha generat una significativa preocupació mediàtica i social. La pràctica del sexting s’ha revelat problemàtica en haver produït greus conseqüències psicològiques i jurídiques, especialment en adolescents, i s’ha posat de manifest la necessitat urgent de desenvolupar estratègies de prevenció adequades. Encara més, mitjançant l’enviament de missatges, imatges o vídeos de sexting, menors (i també adults) creuen sense adonar-se’n un llindar de risc que els exposa sense marxa enrere a diverses formes de victimització (xantatges, venjances o simples indiscrecions altament perjudicials). Així mateix, pot suposar l’inici de delictes sexuals iniciats a través de les TIC (Wolak et al., 2004).En un primer moment, la majoria de recerques realitzades es van centrar a analitzar la prevalença del fenomen i els motius que adduïen els enquestats per obrar d’aquesta manera. Malgrat les diferències en els diversos estudis –en funció del tipus de mostra i dels paràmetres per a definir les conductes objecte de quantificació–, les recerques realitzades apunten sens dubte cap a la presència global d’un fenomen similar. No obstant això, la recerca amb prou feines ha iniciat l’exploració de possibles factors associats al sexting. Aquest estudi pretén –més enllà de mesurar la prevalença del fenomen o descriure els motius aparents dels enquestats– contrastar algunes hipòtesis sobre factors associats al sexting sobre la base d’una mostra de 149 est…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7238/idp.v0i22.2970

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No study has taken into consideration the difference between hard sexting and soft sexting so far.

    “Agustina and Gómez-Durán (2016) agree that no study has taken into consideration the difference between hard sexting and soft sexting so far”

    From Risk factors for being a victim of online grooming in adolescents (2020) · cites this paper as Agustina and Gómez-Durán (2016)

  • The structural characteristics of cyberspace increase the likelihood that SNS users will engage in risk behaviors and may end up being cybervictimized.

    “but recognize that the structural characteristics of cyberspace increase the likelihood that SNS users will engage in risk behaviors and may end up being cybervictimized.”

    From Risk factors for being a victim of online grooming in adolescents (2020) · cites this paper as Agustina and Gómez-Durán (2016)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agustina, J. R., & Gómez-Durán, E. L.
Venue
IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política
Published
2016-07-11
Issue
22
ISSN
1699-8154 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515911311
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
  • IDP Revista de Internet Derecho y Política (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
sexting, risk factors, victimization, sexual victimization, cyberbullying, revenge, sextortion, sexual offences, university students, adolescents, online sexual behavior, prevention, gender differences, age differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review