The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: differences, similarities, and time evolution
Open accessAbstract
Technological progress in recent decades has enabled people to learn in different ways. Universities now have more educational models to choose from, i.e., b-learning and e-learning. Despite the increasing opportunities for students and instructors, online learning also brings challenges due to the absence of direct human contact. Online environments allow the generation of large amounts of data related to learning/teaching processes, which offers the possibility of extracting valuable information that may be employed to improve students’ performance. In this paper, we aim to review the similarities and differences between Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics, two relatively new and increasingly popular fields of research concerned with the collection, analysis, and interpretation of educational data. Their origins, goals, differences, similarities, time evolution, and challenges are addressed, as are their relationship with Big Data and MOOCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Educational Data Mining: A review of the state of the art
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2053532 · Cited by 2,251
Cited by
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1355 · Cited by 1,120
Predicting academic success in higher education: literature review and best practices
Alyahyan, E., & Düştegör, D. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-0177-7 · Cited by 615
Colchester, K., Hagras, H., Alghazzawi, D., & Aldabbagh, G. (2017) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research · doi:10.1515/jaiscr-2017-0004 · Cited by 328
Applications of learning analytics in Latin America
Pontual Falcão, T., Ferreira Mello, R., & Lins Rodrigues, R. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12978 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Calvet Liñán, L., & Juan Pérez, Á. A.
- Venue
- RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal
- Published
- 2015-07-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 98
- ISSN
- 1698-580X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155087493
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: differences, similarities, and time evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2515
- The paper
- Calvet Liñán, L., & Juan Pérez, Á. A. (2015). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: differences, similarities, and time evolution. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.