Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Traditions and Innovations in Teaching Russian Vocabulary to Chinese Learners: Ethnocultural Component

Cherkashina, Tatiana Tikhonovna, Guo, Yue, Sun, Yaling·2026·Педагогика и просвещение

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the study of traditional and innovative approaches to teaching the vocabulary of the Russian language to Chinese learners, with an emphasis on the ethnocultural component. The subject of the research is the peculiarities of applying vocabulary teaching methods that carry an ethnocultural component when working with a Chinese audience. The object of the research is the pedagogical process of teaching Russian as a foreign language at Chinese universities. The relevance of this article is determined by the significant cultural differences between China and Russia, which cause communication difficulties in mastering Russian vocabulary. The author examines in detail topics such as the classification of ethnocultural vocabulary, its groups, and the features of acquisition by Chinese learners. Special attention is given to a comparative analysis of traditional and innovative methods, as well as step-by-step models of their combination. The goal of this research is to analyze traditional and contemporary practices, justify their complementarity, and develop differentiated models for combining methods to enhance the effectiveness of acquiring ethnocultural vocabulary and forming intercultural communicative competence. The study employs methods of literature review, case analysis, and comparative analysis. The empirical basis consists of materials from CNKI and Elibrary from 2020 to 2026. The authors have identified three groups of ethnocultural vocabulary in the Russian language, characterized traditional and innovative methods, and compiled a comparative description of them. Models for step-by-step combination of approaches are proposed, taking into account the level of training of Chinese learners and the typology of lexical units. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the justification of the principle of harmonious combination of traditional and innovative methods, determining differentiated proportions of their application at different stages of learning, as well as in substantiating the effectiveness of modern educational technologies for revealing ethnocultural vocabulary. The main conclusions of the research confirm that the ethnocultural component is an important condition for forming intercultural competence. Traditional methods ensure the systematization of basic knowledge, while innovative methods increase motivation and develop practical communication skills. It should be noted that flexible combination of approaches contributes to the solid mastery of material and correct use of vocabulary in real communicative situations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7256/2454-0676.2026.2.80110

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Chen, Xiaoyu, Li, Juntong & Zhu, Siyu. A study of the mechanism of Russian vocabulary memory in the concept of cognitive morphology perspective // Modern Linguistics. 2025. № 13(5). pp. 141-147. · DOI
  2. Dai, Zhuichen'. Leksika s etnicheskim komponentom znacheniya v soderzhanii obucheniya russkomu yazyku kitaiskikh studentov // Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2024. № 3(106). S. 72-74. doi: 10.24412/1991-5497-2024-3106-72-74. · DOI
  3. Poshtareva, T.V. Formirovanie etnokul'turnoi kompetentnosti uchashchikhsya v polietnicheskoi obrazovatel'noi srede: avtoreferat dis. ... doktora pedagogicheskikh nauk: 13.00.01 / Stavrop. gos. un-t. Stavropol', 2007. 41 s. · DOI
  4. Filippova, M. M. Vzaimosvyaz' yazyka, myshleniya i kul'tury i prepodavanie inostrannogo yazyka // Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya: Sbornik statei. Tom Vypusk 36. Moskva: OOO "MAKS Press", 2008. S. 105-118.
  5. Devdariani, N. V. Formirovanie kul'turovedcheskoi kompetentsii obuchayushchikhsya na zanyatiyakh po russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu // KNZh. 2019. № 4 (29). S. 15-17. URL: DOI: 10.26140/knz4-2019-0804-0003. · DOI
  6. Du, S.L. The Application of the Cultural Comparison Method in the Cultivation of Intercultural Communicative Competence in Junior Middle School English Teaching // Education Theory: Teaching and Learning. 2023. № 2(5). pp. 58-66. https://doi.org/10.55571/ettl.2023041. · DOI
  7. Li, Na, Yan, Lifen, Tsi, Khunvei. Izuchenie osobennostei informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologii v protsesse obucheniya russkomu yazyku: Obrazovatel'naya perspektiva // Vestnik pedagogicheskikh nauk. 2024. № 4. S. 260-266. DOI: 10.62257/2687-1661-2024-4-260-266. · DOI
  8. Yuan, Xinyu. The application of Chinese festival culture in teaching Chinese vocabulary as a foreign language // Modern Linguistics. 2025. № 13(10). pp. 7-12. DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.13101018. · DOI
  9. Sun, Yue. Teaching basic Russian in the age of artificial intelligence // Modern Education Forum. 2025. №8(3). pp. 111-113.
  10. Chzhan, Syaokhuei., Sergeeva, N.N. Metodicheskie osnovy obucheniya kitaiskikh studentov govoreniyu na russkom yazyke // Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 2021. № 6. S. 158-164. DOI: 10.26170/2079-8717_2021_06_18. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cherkashina, T. T., Guo, Y., & Sun, Y.
Venue
Педагогика и просвещение
Published
2026-02
Issue
2
Pages
118-132
ISSN
2454-0676
Cited by
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review