Lifting the Veil: 2 Corinthians 3:7-18 in Light of Jewish Homiletic and Commentary Traditions
Open accessAbstract
This dissertation investigates the exegetical form, rhetorical function, and theological imagery of Paul's midrash on Exodus 34 in 2 Cor 3:7-18. Paul's pattern of biblical exegesis in this passage, which is unique among his letters, has given rise to numerous explanations. The contribution of this study is to read Paul's midrash through comparison with the forms and traditions of Hellenistic Jewish commentaries, particularly Philo of Alexandria's Allegorical Commentary. Through a close textual evaluation, I suggest that Paul's midrash bears the closest formal similarity to a commentary pattern found in Philo's interpretation of secondary biblical lemmata in the Allegorical Commentary. Although Paul may have adopted this pattern from homiletic convention, it seems more likely that he has borrowed it directly from Jewish commentaries, which he could have known through his advanced Jewish education. A study of the reuse of Jewish and Platonic commentary traditions in various contemporary treatises and letters confirms this hypothesis. Such traditions were often incorporated as exegetical excursuses. Reading Paul's midrash on Exodus 34 in light of other exegetical excursuses has several ramifications for the study of 2 Corinthians. First, it offers new evidence for the rhetorical unity of 2 Cor 2:14-4:6. Second, recognizing the presence of covenant renewal themes in both Paul's epistolary frame and in his midrashic excursus suggests that his opponents in 2 Corinthians were Hellenistic Jewish Christian missionaries. Third, paying attention to Paul's complex portrait of Moses, facilitated by his sequential commentary in the Exodus midrash, provides a window into his confrontation with these missionaries. Although he approves of their use of Moses as a model of Christian transformation, Paul wants to distinguish further between Christian and Hellenistic Jewish versions of this tradition. Shying away from the more traditional biblical locus used to promote Mosaic exemplarity in Hellenistic Judaism (Exodus 33), Paul focuses on Moses' role as a renewed covenant minister in Exodus 34. Drawing together central theological themes like covenant renewal, priestly tabernacle vision, and particularly parrhēsia, Paul aims to present Moses as both a foil and an exemplar of the Christian apostle, a figure whose glory should be viewed in light of the glory of Jesus Christ.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 2
- Authors
- Cover, M. B.
- Corresponding author
- Michael Benjamin Cover
- Venue
- Curate ND
- Publisher
- Curate ND
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W2179970641
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- University of Notre Dame
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Exodus 34, Philo of Alexandria, allegorical commentary, biblical exegesis, covenant renewal, Moses, parrhesia, Platonic commentary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review