CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Sampling Many Pots: An Archaeology of Memory and Tradition at a Bahamian Plantation

Wilkie, Laurie A., Farnsworth, Paul·2005·University of Massachusetts Amherst
DOI 10.7275/1221
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This book should be on the must-read list of all

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.7275/1221

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the literature on plantations in archaeology leaves capitalism as a strangely absent force, particularly when the focus is on enslaved communities, with the exception of work on Jamaica influenced by B.W. Higman which focuses on the landscapes of plantations as capitalist forms.

    “Yet in much of the literature on plantations in archaeology leaves capitalism as a strangely absent force, particularly when the focus is on enslaved communities (Deetz 1993; Wilkie and Farnsworth 2005; cf. Croucher, this volume; Hauser, this volume), with the exception of work on Jamaica, influenced by the scholarship of B.W. Higman (1987, 2000) which focuses on the landscapes of plantations as”

    From The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, an Introduction: Provincializing Historical Archaeology (2011) · cites this paper as Wilkie and Farnsworth 2005

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wilkie, L. A., & Farnsworth, P.
Venue
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Publisher
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Published
2005-07-01
DOI
10.7275/1221
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review