The mixed-methods case study of "Zara"
Open accessAbstract
This single-subject, mixed-method, behavioral analytic case-study dissertation presents a systematic, 12-session cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) treatment of “Zara,” an undergraduate student with severe misophonia. Misophonia is a rare condition characterized by an aversive response of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation and negative emotions (e.g. anger, disgust, and/or anxiety) elicited by the presence of specific and commonly encountered sounds (e.g. lip-smacking, chewing). Distress caused by trigger sounds and efforts to avoid and escape from these sounds often result in impairment in functioning. The goals of this case study are to (1) detail the assessment process used; (2) document and analyze the successful implementation of the CBT intervention; and (3) evaluate hypotheses regarding the mechanisms of change. The intervention utilized an A-B research design with a six-month follow-up. The independent variable consisted of a multi-component treatment that included skills training in cognitive restructuring, mindfulness and exposure procedures. The treatment was designed to reinforce adaptive and appropriate coping responses and extinguish the aversive respondent conditioned responses and the negatively reinforced inappropriate coping responses. The dependent variables included both behavioral outcomes (e.g. inappropriate coping behaviors, avoidance, and social interference) and subjective report outcomes (e.g. sensitivity to sounds, distress, and reported SNS…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research literature indicates that in addition to reducing the symptoms of misophonia, depression also improves, but treatment does not constantly improve the quality of life.
“Research literature indicates that in addition to reducing the symptoms of misophonia, depression also improves(22), buttreatmentdoesnotconstantlyimprovethe quality of life (16).”
From Effectiveness of Online Group-mindfulness and Acceptance-based Therapy and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy on Misophonia (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
The finding that anxiety decreased is consistent with Muller et al. (15) and Singer (22), who found that treatment of misophonia effectively reduced anxiety symptoms.
“This finding is consistent with the findings of Muller et al. (15), and Singer (22) studies, who found that the treatment of misophonia effectively reduced anxiety symptoms of patients with misophonia.”
From Effectiveness of Online Group-mindfulness and Acceptance-based Therapy and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy on Misophonia (2022) · cites this paper as Singer (22)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghorbani, S., Ashouri, A., Gharraee, B., & Farahani, H. (2022) · Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.5812/ijpbs-120159 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“OG-CBT was adapted from Singer’s (22) treatment protocol, and treatment components were adjusted and performed based on group sessions.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Singer, D. A.
- Corresponding author
- Singer, David A.
- Venue
- No Publisher Supplied
- Publisher
- No Publisher Supplied
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W2913560473
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- misophonia, cognitive behavioral therapy, sound sensitivity, prolonged exposure therapy, cognitive restructuring, mindfulness, avoidance behavior, sympathetic activation, mechanisms of change, expectancy violation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review