The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Biological Way of Thought
Abstract
(1960). The Biological Way of Thought. The Journal of Higher Education: Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 290-291.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution, the Extended Synthesis
(2010) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262513678.001.0001 · Cited by 964
Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense
Neander, K. (1991) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/289610 · Cited by 887
Short, T. L. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498350 · Cited by 675
THE EFFECT OF ESSENTIALISM ON TAXONOMY—TWO THOUSAND YEARS OF STASIS (I)
HULL, D. L. (1965) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/xv.60.314 · Cited by 577
Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon Names
de Queiroz, K., & Gauthier, J. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992353 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Beckner, M.
- Venue
- Columbia University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Published
- 1959-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W1991952998
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.15
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Biological Way of Thought. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7312/beck93140
- The paper
- Beckner, M. (1959). The Biological Way of Thought. Columbia University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7312/beck93140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
