The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism
Abstract
The most significant shift in environmental governance over the last thirty years has been the convergence of environmental and liberal economic norms toward "liberal environmentalism"—which predicates environmental protection on the promotion and maintenance of a liberal economic order. Steven Bernstein assesses the reasons for this historical shift, introduces a socio-evolutionary explanation for the selection of international norms, and considers the implications for our ability to address global environmental problems. The author maintains that the institutionalization of "sustainable development" at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) legitimized the evolution toward liberal environmentalism. Arguing that most of the literature on international environmental politics is too rationalist and problem-specific, Bernstein challenges the mainstream thinking on international cooperation by showing that it is always for some purpose or goal. His analysis of the norms that guide global environmental policy also challenges the often-presumed primacy of science in environmental governance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics
Wendt, A. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027764 · Cited by 5,885
Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method
Cox, R. W. (1983) · Millennium: Journal of International Studies · doi:10.1177/03058298830120020701 · Cited by 1,488
The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations
Hall, P. A. (1989) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691221380 · Cited by 1,213
International organization: a state of the art on an art of the state
Kratochwil, F., & Ruggie, J. G. (1986) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027363 · Cited by 1,109
Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program
Adler, E., & Haas, P. M. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300001533 · Cited by 1,037
What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?
Bennett, C. J. (1991) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400006116 · Cited by 992
Democracy and the “Washington consensus”
Williamson, J. (1993) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(93)90046-c · Cited by 874
The limits of hegemonic stability theory
Snidal, D. (1985) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830002703x · Cited by 839
Socialization and hegemonic power
Ikenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, C. A. (1990) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830003530x · Cited by 812
Weale, A. (1991) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 769
Cited by
Can non‐state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework
Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2007) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00021.x · Cited by 890
Self-citationBarnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2004) · Power in Global Governance · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491207.001 · Cited by 831
Bakker, K. (2007) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00534.x · Cited by 772
Bäckstrand, K. (2006) · European Environment · doi:10.1002/eet.425 · Cited by 731
On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society
Hurrell, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233106.001.0001 · Cited by 677
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernstein, S.
- Venue
- Columbia University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Published
- 2001-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4300805241
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 59.63
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7312/bern12036
- The paper
- Bernstein, S. (2001). The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. Columbia University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7312/bern12036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.