The DOI matches its Crossref record.
36. The Theory of Democracy Revisited
Abstract
Part 2 The classical issues: what is democracy? definition, proof, and preference - are definitions arbitrary?, a criticism of conventionalism, words as experience carriers, the search for proof, a comparative evaluation Greek democracy and modern democracy - homonymy, not homology, direct or polis democracy, individualism and freedom, old and new, the modern idea and ideal, a reversal of perspective liberty and law - freedom and freedoms, political freedom, liberal freedom, the supremacy of law in Rousseau, autonomy - a criticism, the principle of diminishing consequences, from the rule of law to the rule of legislators equality - a protest ideal, justice and sameness, predemocratic and democratic equalities, equal opportunities and equal circumstances, egalitarian criteria, treatments and outcomes, the maximization of equality, liberty and equality liberism, liberalism, and democracy - overlaps, an unfortunate timing, property and possessive individualism, liberalism defined, liberal democracy, democracy within liberalism, democracy without liberalism market, capitalism, planning, and technocracy - what is planning?, what is the market?, capitalism, individualism, collectivism, market socialism, democratic planning, democracy, power, and incompetence, the role of the expert, the government of science another democracy? - the good society of Rousseau and Marx, democracy and the state in Marx and Lenin, popular democracy, the theory of democratic dictatorship, democracy and demophily, the war of words the poverty of ideology - the exhaustion of ideals, inevitables and evitables, the witch-hunting of ideas, novitism and beyondism, epilogue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data
Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343395032004007 · Cited by 1,317
A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007
Boix, C., Miller, M., & Rosato, S. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012463905 · Cited by 1,072
The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes
Gerschewski, J. (2013) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738860 · Cited by 1,053
Democratic innovations: designing institutions for citizen participation
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5275 · Cited by 915
A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy, 1810-1998
Vanhanen, T. (2000) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343300037002008 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Sartori, G.
- Venue
- Democracy
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Published
- 2016-12-31
- Pages
- 192-196
- ISSN
- 0272-6750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098996331
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 577.81
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 36. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7312/blau17412-044
- The paper
- Sartori, G. (2016). 36. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Democracy. https://doi.org/10.7312/blau17412-044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.