The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Science of Chinese Buddhism: Early Twentieth-Century Engagements
Abstract
Kexue, or science, captured the Chinese imagination in the early twentieth century, promising new knowledge about the world and a dynamic path to prosperity. Chinese Buddhists embraced scientific language and ideas to carve out a place for their religion within a rapidly modernizing society. Examining dozens of previously unstudied writings from the Chinese Buddhist press, this book maps Buddhists’ efforts to rethink their traditions through science in the initial decades of the twentieth century. Buddhists believed science offered an exciting, alternative route to knowledge grounded in empirical thought, much like their own. They encouraged young scholars to study subatomic and relativistic physics while still maintaining Buddhism’s vital illumination of human nature and its crucial support of an ethical system rooted in radical egalitarianism. Showcasing the rich and progressive steps Chinese religious scholars took in adapting to science’s rising authority, this volume offers a key perspective on how a major Eastern power transitioned to modernity in the twentieth century and how its intellectuals anticipated many of the ideas debated by scholars of science and Buddhism today.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Work of Buddhologists such as Eric Hammerstrom and Donald Lopez remind us that the present Shaolin interest in 'Buddhism and Medicine' can be situated on a longer continuum of Buddhist engagement with modernizing discourse through selective appropriation of the rhetoric of science.”
From Desiderata for the Principles of Compilation of a Canon of Buddhism and Medicine (2017) · cites this paper as Hammerstrom 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buddhist building and the Buddhist revival in the work of Holmes Welch
Scott, G. A. (2017) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2017.1392192 · Cited by 11
Desiderata for the Principles of Compilation of a Canon of Buddhism and Medicine
Burton-Rose, D. (2017) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341393 · Cited by 2
Lu, L. (2020) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel11080400 · Cited by 1
Taking Welch and The Practice of Chinese Buddhism into the 21st century
Nichols, B. J. (2017) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2017.1392195 · Cited by 1
Making a Tibetan sect in twentieth-century China
Wu, W. (2017) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2017.1392194 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammerstrom, E.
- Corresponding author
- Hammerstrom, Erik
- Venue
- Columbia University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Published
- 2015-09-08
- OpenAlex
- W4251009784
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Columbia University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Chinese Buddhism, science and religion, Buddhism and modernity, relativism, egalitarianism, Buddhist ethics, twentieth-century China, religion and modernization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Science of Chinese Buddhism: Early Twentieth-Century Engagements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7312/columbia/9780231170345.001.0001
- The paper
- Hammerstrom, E. (2015). The Science of Chinese Buddhism: Early Twentieth-Century Engagements. Columbia University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231170345.001.0001