The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Long Revolution
Abstract
Begins with an examination of the nature of creative activity, then examines theoretical problems in the definition of and analysis of culture and work, and finally examines the concept of the individual and society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tudor Hart, J. (1971) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x · Cited by 3,253
Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore
Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096460 · Cited by 2,418
Supporters, Followers, Fans, and Flaneurs: A Taxonomy of Spectator Identities in Football
Giulianotti, R. (2002) · Journal of Sport and Social Issues · doi:10.1177/0193723502261003 · Cited by 806
National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life
Edensor, T. (2020) · doi:10.4324/9781003086178 · Cited by 780
The dynamics of place brands: An identity-based approach to place branding theory
Kavaratzis, M., & Hatch, M. J. (2013) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593112467268 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, R.
- Venue
- Columbia University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Published
- 1961-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2082725191
- Cited by
- 3,220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.90
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Long Revolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7312/will93760
- The paper
- Williams, R. (1961). The Long Revolution. Columbia University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7312/will93760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
