Cited by 88Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Socio-demographic and behavioural risk factors for cervical cancer and knowledge, attitude and practice in rural and urban areas of North Bengal, India

Open access
Raychaudhuri, Sreejata, Mandal, Sukanta·2012·Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is common among women worldwide. A multitude of risk factors aggravate the disease. This study was conducted to: (1) determine the prevalence and (2) make a comparative analysis of the socio-demographic and behavioural risk factors of cervical cancer and knowledge, attitude and practice between rural and urban women of North Bengal, India. STUDY DESIGN: Community-based cross-sectional study. METHODS: A survey (first in North Bengal) was conducted among 133 women in a rural area (Kawakhali) and 88 women in an urban slum (Shaktigarh) using predesigned semi-structured questionnaires. The respondents were informed of the causes (including HPV), signs and symptoms, prevention of cervical cancer and treatment, and the procedure of the PAP test and HPV vaccination. RESULTS: The prevalence of risk factors like multiparity, early age of marriage, use of cloth during menstruation, use of condom and OCP, early age of first intercourse was 37.2%, 82%, 83.3%, 5.4%, 15.8% and 65.6% respectively. Awareness about the cause, signs and symptoms, prevention of cervical cancer, PAP test and HPV vaccination was 3.6%, 6.3%, 3.6%, 9.5% and 14.5% respectively. Chi-square testing revealed that in the study population, significant differential at 5% exists between rural and urban residents with respect to number of children, use of cloth/sanitary napkins, family history of cancer and awareness regarding causes of cervical cancer. Regarding KAP, again using chi-square tests, surprisingly, level of education is found to be significant for each element of KAP in urban areas in contrast to complete absence of association between education and elements of KAP in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of risk factors were present in both areas, the prevalence being higher in the rural areas. The level of awareness and role of education appears to be insignificant determinants in rural compared to urban areas. This pilot study needs to be followed up by large scale programmes to re-orient awareness campaigns, especially in rural areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.4.1093

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Community-level factors, including stigma, cultural norms, and religious beliefs, often reinforced vaccine hesitancy, though engagement with local leaders and culturally tailored interventions showed promise.

    “Community-level factors, including stigma, cultural norms, and religious beliefs, often reinforced vaccine hesitancy, though engagement with local leaders and culturally tailored interventions showed promise 28,30,34,36.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Abstract reports low HPV-vaccination awareness and recommends reorienting awareness campaigns, especially in rural areas. Searches for stigma, cultural or religious beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, local leaders, and culturally tailored interventions found no passage addressing the claimed barriers or approaches. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Older adolescent girls (15-19 yr) were generally more informed and receptive to HPV vaccination than younger adolescents.

    “Older adolescent girls (15–19 yr) were generally more informed and receptive to HPV vaccination than younger adolescents, likely due to greater exposure to health education or peer discussions12,20,34.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Abstract (pp. 1093–1096; specific page not identified in our copy) reports overall HPV-vaccination awareness among women in rural and urban North Bengal. Searches for ages 15–19 and age-specific vaccine awareness or acceptance found no comparison between older and younger adolescent girls, nor an explanation involving health education or peers. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raychaudhuri, S., & Mandal, S.
Affiliations
North Bengal Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Venue
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2012-04-30
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
1093-1096
ISSN
1513-7368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046377041
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer, risk factors, knowledge, attitudes and practices, urban-rural differences, women's health, human papillomavirus, Pap smear, HPV vaccination, multiparity, early marriage, menstrual hygiene, oral contraceptives, educational attainment, cancer awareness, North Bengal
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Coitus, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Urban Population, Health Behavior, Chi-Square Distribution, Condoms, Marital Status, Papillomavirus Infections, Menstrual Hygiene Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review