Cited by 2Food Quality and Safety StudiesFood, Nutrition, and Cultural PracticesTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies

‘Review of the Origin and Meaning of Ginseng Millet Water Gruel (Insamsokmieum 人蔘粟米飮) used for the Royal Family during the Joseon Dynasty’

Department of Medical Nutrition, Graduate School of East-West Medical Science, Kyung Hee University, Jeong, Yeon-Hyung, Kim, Dong-Ryul, Lim, Hyunjung, Cha, Wung-Seok·2015·Journal of The Korean Society of Food Culture

Abstract

Insamsokmieum (人蔘粟米飮), which is a kind of water gruels made with millet, ginseng, glutinous rice, and some minor ingredients, was frequently used as a medicinal food for the royal family, and it appeared first at the 10th year of King Sukjong's reign. We investigated Insamsokmieum through a literature review and the「SeungjeongwonIlgi(承政院日 記)」 of King Sukjong (肅宗) from his 1st year (1674) to 46th year (1720). We analyzed the nutritional value and efficacy of Insamsokmieum. In Oriental medicine, Insamsokmieum is prescribed mainly to treat symptoms such as nausea, languidness, and exhaustion in King Sukjong and Queen Inhyun (仁顯王后). In nutritional terms, Insamsokmieum has higher nutrition density than that of rice porridges (白粥) and has relatively high vitamin and mineral contents. Some nutrients such as leucine and glutamic acid, which are contained in the millet, are also known to help alleviate these symptoms. Whereas there have been studies on the efficacy and types of diet during the Joseon Dynasty, studies regarding nutrition characteristics are lacking. This study will demonstrate the superiority of dietary treatments of the Joseon Dynasty and their potential for application to modern nutrition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7318/kjfc/2015.30.4.395

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jeong Yeon-Hyung's study of records pertaining to the final days of a king's life and the frequent prescription of 'Ginseng Millet Water Gruel' approached treatment records from a nutritional viewpoint.

    “Jeong Yeon-Hyung's study of records pertaining to the final days of a king's life and the frequent prescription of 'Ginseng Millet Water Gruel' ( insam-sokmium 人蔘粟米飮 ) also approached treatment records from a nutritional viewpoint.”

Authors
Department of Medical Nutrition, G. S. O. E.-W. M. S., Jeong, Y.-H., Kim, D.-R., Lim, H., & Cha, W.-S.
Venue
Journal of The Korean Society of Food Culture
Published
2015-08-30
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
395-405
ISSN
  • 1225-7060 (ISSN-L)
  • 2288-7148
OpenAlex
W2554272878
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education (No. 2010-0020938)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Quality and Safety Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Keywords
King Sukjong, Seungjeongwon Ilgi, medicinal food, nutritional value, glutinous rice, millet, leucine, glutamate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review