The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contemporary Unorthodox Treatments in Cancer Medicine: A Study of Patients, Treatments, and Practitioners
Abstract
Public education, legislative action, and medical advances have failed to deter patients from seeking unorthodox treatments for cancer and other diseases. To study this phenomenon, we interviewed 304 cancer center inpatients and 356 patients under the care of unorthodox practitioners. A concomitant survey of unorthodox practitioners documented their backgrounds and practices. Eight percent of all patients studied never received any conventional therapy, and 54% of patients on conventional therapy also used unorthodox treatments. Forty percent of patients abandoned conventional care entirely after adopting alternative methods. Patients interviewed did not conform to the stereotype of poorly educated, end-stage patients who had exhausted conventional treatment. Practitioners also deviated from the traditional portrait: Of 138 unorthodox practitioners studied, 60% were physicians(M.D.s). Patients are attracted to therapeutic alternatives that reflect social emphasis on personal responsibility, pollution and nutrition, and that move away from perceived deficiencies in conventional medical care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unconventional medicine in the United States-Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use
Eisenberg, D. M., Kessler, R. C., Foster, C., Norlock, F. E., Calkins, D. R., & Delbanco, T. L. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199301283280406 · Cited by 4,177
Why Patients Use Alternative Medicine: Results of a National Study
Astin, J. A. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.19.1548 · Cited by 2,865
Nationwide Survey on Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Cancer Patients in Japan
Hyodo, I., Amano, N., Eguchi, K., Narabayashi, M., Imanishi, J., Hirai, M., Nakano, T., & Takashima, S. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.126 · Cited by 346
Vadiraja, H. S., Rao, M. R., Nagarathna, R., Nagendra, H. R., Rekha, M., Vanitha, N., Gopinath, K. S., Srinath, B. S., Vishweshwara, M. S., Madhavi, Y. S., et al. (2009) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2009.06.004 · Cited by 183
Use of complementary and alternative medicine by Brazilian oncologists
SAMANO, E. S. T., RIBEIRO, L. M., CAMPOS, A. S., LEWIN, F., FILHO, E. S. V., GOLDENSTEIN, P. T., COSTA, L. J. M., & DEL GIGLIO, A. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00524.x · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- CASSILETH, B. R., LUSK, E. J., STROUSE, T. B., & BODENHEIMER, B. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1984-07-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-112
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2095377270
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Unorthodox Treatments in Cancer Medicine: A Study of Patients, Treatments, and Practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-105
- The paper
- CASSILETH, B. R., LUSK, E. J., STROUSE, T. B., & BODENHEIMER, B. J. (1984). Contemporary Unorthodox Treatments in Cancer Medicine: A Study of Patients, Treatments, and Practitioners. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.