Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contemporary Unorthodox Treatments in Cancer Medicine: A Study of Patients, Treatments, and Practitioners

CASSILETH, BARRlE R., LUSK, EDWARD J., STROUSE, THOMAS B., BODENHEIMER, BRENDA J.·1984·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Public education, legislative action, and medical advances have failed to deter patients from seeking unorthodox treatments for cancer and other diseases. To study this phenomenon, we interviewed 304 cancer center inpatients and 356 patients under the care of unorthodox practitioners. A concomitant survey of unorthodox practitioners documented their backgrounds and practices. Eight percent of all patients studied never received any conventional therapy, and 54% of patients on conventional therapy also used unorthodox treatments. Forty percent of patients abandoned conventional care entirely after adopting alternative methods. Patients interviewed did not conform to the stereotype of poorly educated, end-stage patients who had exhausted conventional treatment. Practitioners also deviated from the traditional portrait: Of 138 unorthodox practitioners studied, 60% were physicians(M.D.s). Patients are attracted to therapeutic alternatives that reflect social emphasis on personal responsibility, pollution and nutrition, and that move away from perceived deficiencies in conventional medical care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-105

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 411

Metadata

Authors
CASSILETH, B. R., LUSK, E. J., STROUSE, T. B., & BODENHEIMER, B. J.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1984-07-01
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
105-112
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2095377270
Cited by
411
References
0
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Unorthodox Treatments in Cancer Medicine: A Study of Patients, Treatments, and Practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-105
The paper
CASSILETH, B. R., LUSK, E. J., STROUSE, T. B., & BODENHEIMER, B. J. (1984). Contemporary Unorthodox Treatments in Cancer Medicine: A Study of Patients, Treatments, and Practitioners. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.