The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Decision: Syphilis Tests in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Decision Making
Abstract
Predictive value calculations were used to derive diagnostic guidelines for syphilis. Specificity of the VDRL (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory) and treponemal tests is high in healthy persons but less in elderly and ill persons. Sensitivity of the VDRL test is high in secondary and early latent syphilis but reduced in primary and late syphilis or in cerebrospinal fluid evaluations. Primary syphilis should be diagnosed by darkfield microscopy, with VDRL confirmation for atypical lesions. Screening of asymptomatic persons with the VDRL test, followed by treponemal test confirmation on positive sera, is recommended for all pregnant women, contacts of persons with infectious syphilis, and other high-risk groups. Quantitative VDRL assessment at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment should be used to assess the adequacy of treatment for both late latent and early syphilis. Cerebrospinal fluid VDRL assessment and cell count should be restricted to seropositive persons with a high risk of neurosyphilis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predictive Value of a Single Diagnostic Test in Unselected Populations
Vecchio, T. J. (1966) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196605262742104 · Cited by 941
Neurosyphilis and Penicillin Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Mohr, J. A. (1976) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03270200046031 · Cited by 178
Cited by
Syphilis: Review with Emphasis on Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Some Biologic Features
Singh, A. E., & Romanowski, B. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.2.187 · Cited by 638
LaFond, R. E., & Lukehart, S. A. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.19.1.29-49.2006 · Cited by 634
Hook, E. W., & Marra, C. M. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199204163261606 · Cited by 470
Single-dose azithromycin versus penicillin G benzathine for the treatment of early syphilis.
Riedner, G., Rusizoka, M., Todd, J., Maboko, L., Hoelscher, M., Mmbando, D., Samky, E., Lyamuya, E., Mabey, D., Grosskurth, H., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa044284 · Cited by 296
Neurosyphilis in the modern era
Timmermans, M. (2004) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.031922 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- HART, G.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1986-03-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 368-376
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1980315869
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Decision: Syphilis Tests in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Decision Making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-104-3-368
- The paper
- HART, G. (1986). Diagnostic Decision: Syphilis Tests in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Decision Making. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-104-3-368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.