Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Serum Enzyme Assays in the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Recommendations Based on a Quantitative Analysis

LEE, THOMAS H., GOLDMAN, LEE·1986·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

In the last 20 years, serum enzyme and isoenzyme levels have become the final arbiters by which acute myocardial infarction is diagnosed or excluded. We review the characteristics of these enzymes, the methods and limitations of commonly used assays, and data on diagnostic accuracy and clinical implications of enzyme levels in various settings and offer recommendations on their optimal use. Because of the poor sensitivity of single measurements of cardiac enzyme levels, these assays should not be used in the emergency room to exclude myocardial infarction. If myocardial infarction is suspected, levels of creatine kinase and its MB fraction should be measured at admission and about 12 and 24 hours later. If a myocardial infarction may have occurred more than 24 hours before evaluation, then lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme measurements may increase diagnostic accuracy. Used properly, these assays are remarkably sensitive, but like all tests, optimal interpretation requires insight into technical pitfalls and other causes of misleading results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-105-2-221

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
LEE, T. H., & GOLDMAN, L.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1986-08-01
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
221-233
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1984418749
Cited by
264
References
1
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.