Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemotherapy Alone or Chemotherapy with Chest Radiation Therapy in Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

BUNN, PAUL A., LICHTER, ALLEN S., MAKUCH, ROBERT W., COHEN, MARTIN H., VEACH, STEPHEN R., MATTHEWS, MARY J., ANDERSON, ANITA JOHNSTON, EDISON, MARGARET, GLATSTEIN, ELI, MINNA, JOHN D., IHDE, DANIEL C.·1987·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of concurrent chest radiation therapy on response rate, recurrence, and treatment toxicity among patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer who are receiving combination chemotherapy. DESIGN: Randomized trial with a median follow-up of 57 months. SETTING: A single government institution--the National Cancer Institute. PATIENTS: Consecutive sample of 96 patients with histologically confirmed small cell lung cancer that was confined to the hemithorax of origin or mediastinal and supraclavicular nodes, and which could be encompassed within a tolerable radiation portal ("limited stage"). All patients were followed until death or the end of the study period. INTERVENTIONS: Chemotherapy: Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and lomustine in 6-week cycles alternating with vincristine, adriamycin, and procarbazine in 6-week cycles, for a total of 48 weeks. Radiation therapy: Chest irradiation to 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, given simultaneously with the first chemotherapy cycle. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The combined therapy led to a significantly higher response rate (complete responses, 81%, compared with partial responses, 43%; 95% Cl for the difference, 20% to 56%), significantly improved local control of the chest tumor (p less than 0.001), and significantly longer survival (p less than 0.035) (median, 15.0 months, compared with 11.6 for chemotherapy alone). The combined therapy produced significantly more myelosuppression, weight loss, esophagitis, and pulmonary dysfunction. There were more infections and deaths from toxicity in the combined treatment group, but the differences between groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A regimen of combined chemotherapy and chest radiation therapy given concurrently is superior to chemotherapy given alone in inducing remission and prolonging survival in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer, and the benefit of combined therapy is reduced by its greater toxicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-106-5-655

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
BUNN, P. A., LICHTER, A. S., MAKUCH, R. W., COHEN, M. H., VEACH, S. R., MATTHEWS, M. J., ANDERSON, A. J., EDISON, M., GLATSTEIN, E., MINNA, J. D., & IHDE, D. C.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1987-05-01
Volume
106
Issue
5
Pages
655-662
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2103926757
Cited by
225
References
1
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemotherapy Alone or Chemotherapy with Chest Radiation Therapy in Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-106-5-655
The paper
BUNN, P. A., LICHTER, A. S., MAKUCH, R. W., COHEN, M. H., VEACH, S. R., MATTHEWS, M. J., ANDERSON, A. J., EDISON, M., GLATSTEIN, E., MINNA, J. D., & IHDE, D. C. (1987). Chemotherapy Alone or Chemotherapy with Chest Radiation Therapy in Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-106-5-655

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.