Glyburide or Insulin for Metabolic Control in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative efficacy, risks, and benefits of insulin with glyburide in achieving normoglycemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 9-month treatment period. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-one patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who did not have normal glucose control with diet alone. INTERVENTIONS: Once-per-day NPH insulin and placebo glyburide, or glyburide and once-per-day placebo insulin injection. Active drug and placebo adjusted in parallel to achieve fasting plasma glucose level less than 6.4 mmol/L (115 mg/dL) without hypoglycemia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Insulin and glyburide produced similar improvement in fasting blood glucose levels and hemoglobin A1c concentrations, similar frequencies of mild symptomatic hypoglycemia, and similar weight gain despite dietary reinforcement. Triglyceride and cholesterol levels decreased and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ratios of high-density lipoprotein to total cholesterol increased in both groups, with a significantly greater improvement in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ratio of high-density lipoprotein total cholesterol in patients treated with insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with glyburide or once-per-day NPH insulin provides a similar degree of glucose control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Insulin may have a relative advantage in that it is associated with higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and a higher ratio of high-density lipoprotein to total cholesterol.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insulin therapy has beneficial effects on triacylglycerol and HDL cholesterol levels, especially in patients with poor glycemic control.
“Insulin therapy has beneficial effects on triacylglycerol and HDL cholesterol levels, especially in patients with poor glycemic control (74)”
From Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy (2009) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- NATHAN, D. M., ROUSSELL, A., & GODINE, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Boston, Massachusetts
- Corresponding author
- NATHAN, DAVID M.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1988-03-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 334-340
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2015904026
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- glibenclamide, insulin therapy, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, hypoglycemia, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, weight gain, NPH insulin
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glyburide, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Isophane, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Triglycerides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review