Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,805

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Pasteurization of France

·1989·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

47 chapter 7 were printed out of order. While this flaw may only be a careless oversight, it adds to the reader's confusion, which is already significant. In conclusion, Engelmeier and O'Connell, the editors of this book, define dilated cardiomyopathy as distinct from ischemic cardiac disease. They claim that its incidence is increasing, and that it is quite probably linked to myocarditis. They then include papers from studies which do not discriminate between the ischemic and dilated forms of cardiomyopathy, thereby undermining the presumed importance of their book. For this reason, I do not recommend the volume. It is a complex world, and the human mind is simple: we tend to simplify our environment through generalizations and categorizations. In similar fashion, we simplify history by dwelling on dates and facts and by attributing major events and broad trends to the actions of a few individuals. The Franco-Russian wars of the early nineteenth century, including the battles of Moscow and Tarutino, have often been attributed to the journeying of a single man, Napoleon, and his "Grande Armee." Indeed, we often speak of the "Napoleonic Era." Latour points out the manner in which Tolstoy reacted against that simplification, noting how Tolstoy's monumental War and Peace was an attempt, in a mere eight hundred pages, to "give back to the multitude the effectiveness that the historians of his century placed in the virtue or genius of a few men." Likewise, Bruno Latour points to the recurrent fallacy in the history of science of "the great man ... alone in his laboratory, alone with his concepts ... he revolutionizes the society around him by the power of his mind alone." This reductionist scenario is far too simple; it ignores the broad forces and movements in science and in society which both influence the revolutionary and which implement his "revolution." In The Pasteurization ofFrance, the author critically examines the myth of Pasteur, a myth in which Pasteur is the leviathan who conquers the world of microbes and, with his Germ Theory, single-handedly brings the French people and the world into the Modern Age. The Pasteurization of France is presented in two parts. The first consists of three major chapters and begins with the story of the rise of the hygienists in the latter part of the nineteenth century. Latour sets out to prove that the microbiological revolution (to borrow a political term) which occurred in …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-111-1-98_1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,805

Metadata

Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1989-07-01
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
98-98
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W4245841243
Cited by
1,805
References
0
FWCI
263.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pasteurization of France. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-111-1-98_1
The paper
The Pasteurization of France. (1989). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-111-1-98_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.