The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Serologic Response to Treatment of Infectious Syphilis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the serologic response to treatment of patients with infectious syphilis. DESIGN: Historical cohort study of all cases of infectious syphilis in Alberta from 1981 to 1987. PATIENTS: A total of 1090 patients were entered; 857 with primary syphilis, 183 with secondary syphilis, and 50 with early latent disease. Two hundred and eight patients were excluded who either were pregnant, had negative serologic results before treatment, had clinical relapse, were treatment failures, or were lost to follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: All 882 evaluable patients were treated with a recommended antibiotic regimen for infectious syphilis and returned for re-assessment including repeat serologic testing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-two percent (95% CI, 66% to 77%) and 56% (CI, 43% to 70%) of patients with initial episodes of primary or secondary syphilis had seroreverted according to rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test results by 36 months. A 2- and 3-tube decline was seen by 6 and 12 months in primary and secondary syphilis. Early latent syphilis resulted in only a 2-tube decrease at 12 months. Serologic response was not affected by sex, age, race, or sexual orientation. Patients with their first infection were more likely to experience RPR seroreversal than those with repeat infections. The RPR reversal rates also depended on the pretreatment titer and stage of disease. At 36 months, 24% (CI, 20% to 28%) of patients had nonreactive fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption tests (FTA-Abs), and 13% (CI, 11% to 15%) had nonreactive microhemoglutination tests for Treponema pallidum (MHA-TP). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate therapeutic response for syphilis must be based on illness episode and the pretreatment RPR titer. Treponemal tests can demonstrate seroreversion after 36 months, and a negative treponemal test does not rule out a past history of syphilis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021
Workowski, K. A., Bachmann, L. H., Chan, P. A., Johnston, C. M., Muzny, C. A., Park, I., Reno, H., Zenilman, J. M., & Bolan, G. A. (2021) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1 · Cited by 3,018
Syphilis: Review with Emphasis on Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Some Biologic Features
Singh, A. E., & Romanowski, B. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.2.187 · Cited by 638
Self-citationRolfs, R. T., Joesoef, M. R., Hendershot, E. F., Rompalo, A. M., Augenbraun, M. H., Chiu, M., Bolan, G., Johnson, S. C., French, P., Steen, E., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199707313370504 · Cited by 550
Hook, E. W., & Marra, C. M. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199204163261606 · Cited by 470
Hook, E. W. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32411-4 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Romanowski, B., Sutherland, R., Fick, G. H., Mooney, D., & Love, E. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1991-06-15
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1005-1009
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2064975309
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serologic Response to Treatment of Infectious Syphilis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-114-12-1005
- The paper
- Romanowski, B., Sutherland, R., Fick, G. H., Mooney, D., & Love, E. J. (1991). Serologic Response to Treatment of Infectious Syphilis. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-114-12-1005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.