Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality of Life in Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Measurement by the Medical Outcomes Study Instrument

Wachtel, Tom, Piette, John, Mor, Vincent, Stein, Michael, Fleishman, John, Carpenter, Charles·1992·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey as an indicator for quality of life in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). DESIGN: Patient interview survey. SETTING: The AIDS Health Services Program in seven sites: Newark and Jersey City, New Jersey; Nassau County, New York; Atlanta, Georgia; Dallas, Texas; Fort Lauderdale and Miami, Florida; New Orleans, Louisiana; and Seattle, Washington. PATIENTS: Patients (520) with HIV infection receiving health services at one of the above sites. MEASUREMENTS: All components of the MOS Short Form Health Survey were included in the interview. Minor modifications were made to adapt the survey to the particular circumstances of the study. Measured sociodemographic characteristics included age, sex, race, intravenous drug use, and education. Symptoms were assessed by closed-ended questions concerning memory, seizure, weakness or numbness, fever, chills, diaphoreses, dyspnea, diarrhea, and weight loss. Information on the frequency of symptoms was also collected. History of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and Kaposi sarcoma was noted. MAIN RESULTS: The sociodemographic characteristics resemble those of patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) reported to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC): mean age, 36; men, 89%; nonwhite, 31%; intravenous drug use, 34%. Neurologic symptoms (memory trouble, seizures, weakness or numbness) occurred in 71% of patients; constitutional symptoms (fever, chills, night sweats, weight loss) in 69%; dyspnea in 50%; and diarrhea in 47%. Although older age, female sex, nonwhite race, and intravenous drug use were associated with lower MOS scores in several areas, the strongest single or adjusted indicator of lower MOS scores was the presence of symptoms. Finally, patients with HIV infection had significantly lower scores than did previously reported patients with other chronic medical conditions (P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MOS survey is a reliable measure of quality of life for patients with HIV infection. These patients tend to have low scores, suggesting validity of the survey. The MOS survey is extremely sensitive to the effect of symptoms, which suggests that it might be useful as a quality-of-life indicator for AIDS clinical drug trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-116-2-129

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Wachtel, T., Piette, J., Mor, V., Stein, M., Fleishman, J., & Carpenter, C.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1992-01-15
Volume
116
Issue
2
Pages
129-137
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1992735212
Cited by
351
References
5
FWCI
18.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of Life in Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Measurement by the Medical Outcomes Study Instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-116-2-129
The paper
Wachtel, T., Piette, J., Mor, V., Stein, M., Fleishman, J., & Carpenter, C. (1992). Quality of Life in Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Measurement by the Medical Outcomes Study Instrument. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-116-2-129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.