The DOI matches its Crossref record.
American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: Third Edition
Abstract
Medicine, law, and social values are not static and must be re-examined periodically. This edition of the ACP Ethics Manual covers emerging issues in medical ethics and revisits some old issues. The overview of the evolution of medical ethics, which appeared in previous editions of the Manual, has been eliminated to allow more space for the consideration of today's ethical dilemmas. Other changes include a revised chapter on end-of-life care, discussion of physician-assisted suicide, revised sections on conflicts of interest and on medical risk to the physician and patient, given developments in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and discussion of sexual contact between physician and patient. A statement on disclosure of errors and a section on care of the physician's family have also been added. The sections on confidential information told by a patient's family or friend to the physician; on physician-pharmaceutical industry relations; on physicians in training; and on the impaired physician have been expanded. Sections on advertising, peer review, and resource allocation have been revised. The literature of biomedical ethics expands at a rate that does not allow a bibliography to remain current, so an exhaustive list of references or suggested readings is not included in this manual. Instead, only cited references are listed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Malpractice: Lessons From Plaintiff Depositions
Beckman, H. B. (1994) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420120093010 · Cited by 760
Sedation in the Management of Refractory Symptoms: Guidelines for Evaluation and Treatment
Cherny, N. I., & Portenoy, R. K. (1994) · Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.1177/082585979401000207 · Cited by 422
To tell the truth: Ethical and practical issues in disclosing medical mistakes to patients
Wu, A. W., Cavanaugh, T. A., McPhee, S. J., Lo, B., & Micco, G. P. (1997) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07163.x · Cited by 383
Bashore, T. M., Bates, E. R., Berger, P. B., Clark, D. A., Cusma, J. T., Dehmer, G. J., Kern, M. J., Laskey, W. K., O’Laughlin, M. P., Oesterle, S., et al. (2001) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01346-8 · Cited by 320
Seven Legal Barriers to End-of-Life Care<SUBTITLE>Myths, Realities, and Grains of Truth</SUBTITLE>
Meisel, A. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.19.2495 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 947-960
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W3021183132
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: Third Edition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-117-11-947
- The paper
- American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: Third Edition. (1992). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-117-11-947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.